Enrichment of Human Milk With Human and Bovine Milk-based Fortifiers for Very Preterm Infants: a Meta-analysis

NCT ID: NCT06870318

Last Updated: 2025-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

355 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research has shown that provision of mother's milk is the optimal way to feed very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Many infants will require a supplement to mother's milk, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) compared to preterm formula is the most appropriate supplement as it has been shown to reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

Most available evidence suggests neither mother's milk nor PDHM will meet the elevated nutritional requirements of VLBW infants without multi-nutrient fortification. Globally, the current standard of care is to use bovine protein-based nutrient fortifiers to meet these elevated nutrient requirements. Given the known benefits of mother's milk, the reduction in the risk of NEC with use of PDHM as a supplement, and the availability of human milk-based multi-nutrient fortifiers (HMBF), there has been considerable interest in the efficacy of HMBF over the less costly bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF).

This study is an analysis of individual participant data merged from randomized control trials that examined the efficacy of HMBF compared to BMBF during hospitalization, on the risk of death and severe morbidity or major feeding interruption. Participants of the trials included in the analyses were fed exclusively with human milk or a supplement of pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM).

Only two RCTs met this criteria -OptiMoM and the N-forte trial. In both studies the intervention aligned to commence upon randomization into the HMBF or BMBF groups. The difference between the OptiMoM and N-forte feeding protocols was that the later allowed for individualized fortification based on milk analysis whereas OptiMoM used standard fortification, predominant in Canada and globally.

For OptiMoM, the feeding intervention continued until infants were 84 days of age, discharge, or when the infant consumed ≥2 complete oral feeds daily. For N-forte trial, the feeding intervention ended when babies reached 34 weeks (zero days). Both studies followed participants and continued data collection if transferred to a level II NICU for convalescence (OptiMoM) or home care service followed closely by NICU nurses (N-forte) until discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Human Milk Fortification Very Low Birth Weight Baby Human Milk Nutrition Human Milk Feeding Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis Growth Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infant Mortality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Human milk-based multi-nutrient fortifiers (HMBF) group

Infants born VLBW fed exclusively with Human Milk (parent milk or pasteurized donor milk) fortified with HMBF

No intervention; Observational study

Intervention Type OTHER

OptiMoM-NForte is meta-analysis study (observational secondary use of data), the investigators will analyze data from the OptiMoM and NForte trials. No interventions form part of this study.

Bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF) group

Infants born VLBW fed exclusively with Human Milk (parent milk or pasteurized donor milk) fortified with BMBF

No intervention; Observational study

Intervention Type OTHER

OptiMoM-NForte is meta-analysis study (observational secondary use of data), the investigators will analyze data from the OptiMoM and NForte trials. No interventions form part of this study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No intervention; Observational study

OptiMoM-NForte is meta-analysis study (observational secondary use of data), the investigators will analyze data from the OptiMoM and NForte trials. No interventions form part of this study.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Infant is a participant of the OptiMoM or the N-Forte trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Hour

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Östergötland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Deborah O'Connor

Senior Associate Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deborah L O'Connor, PhD, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children

Magnus Domellöf, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University, Umeå (UMU)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Umeå University

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jensen GB, Ahlsson F, Domellof M, Elfvin A, Naver L, Abrahamsson T. Nordic study on human milk fortification in extremely preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial-the N-forte trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e053400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053400.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34815288 (View on PubMed)

Corrigendum for O'Connor et al. Nutrient enrichment of human milk with human and bovine milk-based fortifiers for infants born weighing < 1250 g: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108:108-16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 May 1;111(5):1112. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa042. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32367115 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4784

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Human Milk in Preterm Infants
NCT05228535 UNKNOWN NA
Human Milk Fortification in Extremely Preterm Infants
NCT03797157 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Preemie Milk Analyser Validation Study
NCT06486194 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Preterm Infants Fed a Human Milk Fortifier
NCT05551975 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA