Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
710 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-01
2018-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Two Distal Colonoscope Attachments
NCT02665741
Effectiveness and Safety of the Colonoscopy Assisted by Endocuff vs. Standard in the Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT04280393
Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) Versus Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) in the Identification of Colonic Polyps in a Screening Population.
NCT02754661
Endocuff Enhanced Colonoscopy: Does it Improve Polyp Detection and Make Rectal Retroflexion Unnecessary
NCT05615857
Does the Cap Increase the Finding of Polyps When Water Exchange Colonoscopy is Used
NCT03566615
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing the adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing Endocuff Vision™-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy. Patients are randomized according to bowel cancer screening status to receive Endocuff Vision™-assisted colonoscopy or cap colonoscopy on the day of procedure. Baseline data, colonoscopy, and polyp data including histology are collected. Patients are followed up at 30 days for complications. This study will take place in an University Hospital in Spain. A maximum of 9 expert colonoscopists will recruit a total of 712 patients.
This is the first trial to evaluate the adenoma detection rate of Endocuff Vision™ vs cap colonoscopy in all screening, surveillance, and diagnostic patient groups. This study will guide clinicians to decide what device to use to increase adenoma detection rate in routine colonoscopy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endocuff colonoscopy
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy
Endocuff
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy
Cap colonoscopy
Cap-assisted colonoscopy
cap
Cap-assisted colonoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endocuff
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy
cap
Cap-assisted colonoscopy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with established or suspicion of large bowel obstruction or pseudo-obstruction;
* patients with known colonic strictures;
* patients with a known severe diverticular segment (that is likely to impede colonoscope passage);
* patients with active or known colitis (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's colitis, diverticulitis, infective colitis);
* patients lacking capacity to give informed consent;
* patients on clopidogrel, warfarin, or other new generation anticoagulants who have not stopped this for the procedure;
* patients who are attending for a therapeutic procedure or assessment of a known lesion, or submitted for rectoscopy or rectosigmoidoscopy;
* examination performed by a non-expert colonoscopist;
* pregnancy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital General Universitario Elche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
JAVIER SOLA VERA SANCHEZ
M.D, Ph D
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Javier Sola Vera, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital General Universitario de Elche
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital General Universitario de Elche
Elche, Alicante, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
Floer M, Biecker E, Fitzlaff R, Roming H, Ameis D, Heinecke A, Kunsch S, Ellenrieder V, Strobel P, Schepke M, Meister T. Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114267. eCollection 2014.
van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A, Wientjes CA, Mallant-Hent RC, Siersema PD, Tytgat K, Tuynman H, Kuiken SD, Houben G, Stokkers P, Moons L, Bossuyt P, Fockens P, Mundt MW, Dekker E. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
Marsano J, Tzimas D, Mckinley M, et al. Endocuff assisted colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rates: a multi-center study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79(5 Suppl):AB550
Biecker E, Floer M, Heinecke A, Strobel P, Bohme R, Schepke M, Meister T. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):413-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166.
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kato N, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Hood-assisted colonoscopy is more effective in detection of colorectal adenomas than narrow-band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS, Gupta N, Wani SB, Shipe T, Gaddam S, Singh V, Sharma P. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012 Mar;61(3):402-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Hewett DG, Rex DK. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
Frieling T, Neuhaus F, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Heise J, Kreysel C, Hulsdonk A, Blank M, Czypull M. Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Z Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;51(12):1383-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335637. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Dees J, Tytgat KM, van Leerdam ME, Fockens P, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1426-34. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301327. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Morgan J, Thomas K, Lee-Robichaud H, Nelson RL. Transparent Cap Colonoscopy versus Standard Colonoscopy for Investigation of Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD008211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008211.pub2.
Pohl H, Bensen SP, Toor A, Gordon SR, Levy LC, Berk B, Anderson PB, Anderson JC, Rothstein RI, MacKenzie TA, Robertson DJ. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):891-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392261. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Sola-Vera J, Catala L, Uceda F, Pico MD, Perez Rabasco E, Saez J, Jimenez N, Arjona MD, Fernandez M, Girona E, Garcia-Sepulcre MF. Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study. Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):742-749. doi: 10.1055/a-0901-7306. Epub 2019 May 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ADR-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.