Effectiveness of High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT03133520

Last Updated: 2020-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-01

Study Completion Date

2018-09-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Effectiveness of high flow oxygen therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for ICU admission in immunocompromised patients. Usual oxygen therapy involves administering low-to-medium oxygen flows through a nasal cannula or mask to achieve SpO2≥95%.

High-flow nasal oxygen \[HFNO\] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) values of nearly 100%. Physiological benefits of HFNO consist of higher and constant FiO2 values, decreased work of breathing, nasopharyngeal washout leading to improved breathing-effort efficiency, and higher positive airway pressures associated with better lung recruitment.

Clinical consequences of these physiological benefits include alleviation of dyspnea and discomfort, decreases in tachypnea and signs of respiratory distress, a diminished need for intubation in patients with severe hypoxemia, and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure However, although preliminary data establish the feasibility and safety of this technique, HFNO has never been properly evaluated in immunocompromised patients.

Thus, this project aims at demonstrating that HFNO is superior to low/medium-flow (standard) oxygen, minimizing the need for endotracheal intubation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Hematologic Malignancy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard oxygen group

This patient groups will receive only routine oxygen therapy. Routine oxygen therapy involves administering low-to-medium oxygen flows through a nasal cannula or mask to achieve SpO2≥95%.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

High flow oxygen therapy group

This patients group will receive high flow oxygen therapy. High flow nasal oxygen therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, it allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) values of nearly 100%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High flow oxygen therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

High-flow nasal oxygen \[HFNO\] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) values of nearly 100%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High flow oxygen therapy

High-flow nasal oxygen \[HFNO\] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) values of nearly 100%.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Known immunosuppression defined as haematological malignancy.
* Need for oxygen therapy defined as with oxygen free arterial blood gas examination one or more of the following: (a) PaO2/FiO2\<300 mmHg (b) PaCO2≤45 mmHg (c) SaO2\<92%
* Respiratory distress with a respiratory rate \>22/min

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of study participation
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Hypercapnia with a formal indication for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) (PaCO2 ≥ 45 mmHg)
* Patients whose clinicians have decided on NIMV (Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation) and IMV (Invasive Mechanical Ventilation)
* Haemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg)
* Vasopressor needs
* Awareness confusion and disorientation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kursat Gundogan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kursat Gundogan

Associate professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erciyes University Medical School

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Turkoglu M, Erdem GU, Suyani E, Sancar ME, Yalcin MM, Aygencel G, Aki Z, Sucak G. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with hematological malignancies. Hematology. 2013 May;18(3):123-30. doi: 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000038. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23321772 (View on PubMed)

Lemiale V, Mokart D, Mayaux J, Lambert J, Rabbat A, Demoule A, Azoulay E. The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care. 2015 Nov 2;19:380. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26521922 (View on PubMed)

Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25003980 (View on PubMed)

Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26975498 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

November, 2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.