Assessment of Oxygen Extraction Rate Changes Following Red Blood Cell Transfusion in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT05798130
Last Updated: 2024-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
88 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-01
2023-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Blood Group on the Survival Status of Intensive Care Patients
NCT04460625
Effectiveness of High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT03133520
Factors Affecting Mortality and Morbidity in Trauma Patients Followed in Intensive Care Unit
NCT05175872
Intensive Care Unit Risk Score
NCT04661735
Oxygen Extraction-guided Transfusion in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03767127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
No additional procedures will be performed on patients during the study, and the decision to transfuse will not be influenced by the results of the examinations. For patients in whom the decision to transfuse red blood cells was made in accordance with the critical care protocol, the clinical decision and policy to transfuse a single unit and, accordingly, a restrictive transfusion strategy with a target hemoglobin of 7 g/dl are applied.
The patient's oxygen extraction rate is calculated using the following formula by considering the difference between the oxygen content of the venous and arterial blood gasses measured before transfusion.
CaO2 = SaO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PaO2 x 0.0031) CcvO2 = ScvO2 x Hb x 1.39 + (PcvO2 x 0.0031) O2ER = CaO2 - CcvO2/CaO2
Patients to be followed until day 90 post-transfusion will be evaluated in two separate groups according to oxygen extraction rate \< 30% and ≥30% after pretransfusion blood gas analysis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the percentage change in oxygen extraction rate after transfusion between the two groups with oxygen extraction rates of \< 30% and ≥30%. The secondary objective is to examine the difference between the groups in 28-day mortality, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) values related to tissue oxygenation, amount of blood products consumed, and length of ICU stay, as well as complication rates such as acute renal failure and acute lung injury.
Age, sex, comorbidities, reasons for ICU hospitalization, and number of days in the ICU before transfusion of participants are demographically recorded. The following values will be noted by the observer before and after transfusion: systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, NIRS values, blood gas analysis; pH, PaO2, PaCO2, SaO2, base deficit, HCO3, lactate, PcvO2, PcvCO2, ScvO2, FiO2, CaO2, CcvO2, AV-O2 difference, O2ER, PaO2/FiO2, lactate clearance, CVP, vasoactive inotrope score. In addition, the SAPS, APACHE-II, SOFA scores of the 1st and 5th day, hemoglobin and hematocrit values of the first 5 days, MCV, MPV, RDW, INR, platelet count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, number of mechanical ventilator-dependent days, number of vasopressor-dependent days, and number of the intensive care unit stay days are monitored. In addition, the development of complications such as acute respiratory failure, acute renal failure, development of infections, stroke, and myocardial infarction in participants will be tracked. The occurrence of mortality at day 7, 28, and 90 will be reported in the study results.
In the reference study1, patients were studied in 2 separate groups with oxygen extraction rates of \< 30% and ≥30%. There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of change in oxygen extraction rate after 15 minutes. The mean±standard deviation of the groups was -5.2±7.8 and 0.7±5.8, respectively, and p=0.004. In the power analysis performed, it was assumed that the type 1 error was 0.05 and the power of the study was 0.80, so it would be sufficient to reach 29 patients in both groups. Considering a 10% probability of loss to data acquisition, it would be sufficient to reach a total of 65 patients.
All statistical analyzes will be performed using the SPSS 22 program. Descriptive statistics are expressed with mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and with numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Prior to all analyzes, skewness- kurtosis tests, normality tests, and histogram graphs are used to determine whether the data conform to the normal distribution. In determining differences in means between groups, the T test for independent variables or the T test for dependent variables is used for variables with normal distribution; the Mann-Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon test is used for variables that do not conform to normal distribution. The chi-square test or the Fischer exact test is used to determine the differences between groups for categorical variables. The difference values between the means of repeated measures in the groups are evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. In the case of more than two time periods, the evaluation of time, groups, and joint effects is performed with the two-way test ANOVA (analysis of variance) for repeated measures. Post-hoc analyzes will be performed using the Bonferonni test. The effect of independent variables on mortality is assessed by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be analyzed with respect to the oxygen extraction rate predicting 28-day mortality in both groups. For all analyzes to be performed, a p\< 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Oxygen Extraction Rate < 30% Group
Oxygen Extraction Rate \< 30%
No intervention group.
No intervention group.
Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30% Group
Oxygen Extraction Rate ≥ 30%
No intervention group.
No intervention group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention group.
No intervention group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients followed in the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours
* Patients with central venous catheters
* Patients who have received a decision to transfuse red blood cells
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with acute bleeding
* Patients in hemorrhagic shock
* Patients with acute traumatic brain injury
* Pregnant patients
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmet Salih Tüzen, MD
Medical Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmet Salih Tüzen
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Murat Aksun
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Orlov D, O'Farrell R, McCluskey SA, Carroll J, Poonawala H, Hozhabri S, Karkouti K. The clinical utility of an index of global oxygenation for guiding red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery. Transfusion. 2009 Apr;49(4):682-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02022.x.
Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational noninterventional study. Transfusion. 2025 May;65(5):863-875. doi: 10.1111/trf.18164. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Tuzen AS, Aksun M, Sencan A, Girgin S, Golboyu BE, Kirbas G, Sanli O. Assessment of oxygen extraction rate changes following red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit: a protocol for a prospective observational non-interventional study. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 30;13(8):e074413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074413.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-GOKAE-0103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.