Evaluation of the Fluid Response of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Patients in Intensive Care; Pleth Variability Index
NCT ID: NCT04373213
Last Updated: 2020-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-05
2020-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plethysmographic Perfusion Index and Fluid Responsiveness
NCT06313671
Reliability of Respiratory Variability of Maximal Aortic Blood Flow Velocity Obtained by Ultrasonography-doppler in Patients Followed Up with a Diagnosis of Shock in Intensive Care Unit for Evaluating Fluid Responsiveness in Patients
NCT06845280
Factors Affecting Mortality in Critical Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019
NCT04659876
Comparison of Extra Vascular Lung Water Index in Covid-19 ARDS and "Typical"ARDS Patients
NCT04508933
Effect of Prone Position on Oxygen, Blood Gas, and Respiratory Parameters in Intensive Care Patients With COVID-19-induced ARDS
NCT06997666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pleth variability index
Patients undergoing fluid management with Pleth variability index
Pleth variability index
The usefulness of Pleth variability index in predicting fluid response in patients with COVID 19
hemodynamic
Patients undergoing fluid management with hemodynamic findings
Pleth variability index
The usefulness of Pleth variability index in predicting fluid response in patients with COVID 19
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pleth variability index
The usefulness of Pleth variability index in predicting fluid response in patients with COVID 19
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients over the age of 18
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erzincan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ILKE KUPELI
assoc. prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ILKE KUPELI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erzincan University
Erzincan, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Basso F, Berdin G, Virzi GM, Mason G, Piccinni P, Day S, Cruz DN, Wjewodzka M, Giuliani A, Brendolan A, Ronco C. Fluid management in the intensive care unit: bioelectrical impedance vector analysis as a tool to assess hydration status and optimal fluid balance in critically ill patients. Blood Purif. 2013;36(3-4):192-9. doi: 10.1159/000356366. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
Claure-Del Granado R, Mehta RL. Fluid overload in the ICU: evaluation and management. BMC Nephrol. 2016 Aug 2;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0323-6.
de Oliveira OH, Freitas FG, Ladeira RT, Fischer CH, Bafi AT, Azevedo LC, Machado FR. Comparison between respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients. J Crit Care. 2016 Aug;34:46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Piskin O, Oz II. Accuracy of pleth variability index compared with inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(47):e8889. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008889.
Liu T, Xu C, Wang M, Niu Z, Qi D. Reliability of pleth variability index in predicting preload responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 May 8;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0744-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EBYU COVİD PVI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.