Effect of Simethicone on Screening Colonoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03119168

Last Updated: 2019-06-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

268 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-15

Study Completion Date

2019-04-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is evaluating the effect of adding a high dose of simethicone to the standard polyethylene glycol preparation for screening colonoscopy in the quality of the preparation , adenoma detection rate and withdrawal times.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A proper bowel preparation is key to a thorough and safe colonoscopy. Several factors affect the mucosal visualization during colonoscopy, and consequently the quality of such evaluation. Undoubtedly, this can have unfavorable implications like missed lesions. One of the most commonly encountered scenarios is the presence of multiple bubbles that interfere with mucosal visualization. When this occurs, simethicone (an antifoam agent used to reduce bloating when ingested orally) is injected through the colonoscope to eliminate the bubbles and get a clear view of the mucosa. A few studies have used oral simethicone in conjunction with oral preparation agents (PEG, magnesium citrate, sodium phosphate) in an attempt to improve the quality of the preparation. Unfortunately these studies have not used the exact same preparation agent with and without simethicone, making it difficult to draw conclusions on its efficacy. However, it is important to understand that simethicone is not intended to decrease the amount of stool in the colon, and it's purpose is to decrease the amount of bubbles interfering with the visualization of the mucosa provided that there is no stool present . Furthermore, it is unclear if adding simethicone to a standard bowel preparation makes a significant difference in key aspects of screening colonoscopy such as adenoma detection rate or withdrawal times. This prospective randomized controlled, observer blinded study at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in El Paso, aims at studying the effect of simethicone on the overall colon preparation as well as on adenoma detection rate and withdrawal times.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adenoma Colon

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Simethicone solution + Polyethylenglycol

This arm of the study will include the patients assigned to take simethicone solution with their colon preparations ( 4L Polyethyleneglycol)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simethicone Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will be assigned randomly to take Simethicone Solution plus polyethylenglycol

Polyethylenglycol

This arm of the study will include the patients assigned to take a regular bowel preparation (4L Polyethylenglycol)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Polyethylenglycol

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in this arm will be randomly assigned to take polyethylenglycol as their regular bowel preparation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simethicone Solution

Patients will be assigned randomly to take Simethicone Solution plus polyethylenglycol

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyethylenglycol

Patients in this arm will be randomly assigned to take polyethylenglycol as their regular bowel preparation

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mylicon

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients between the ages of 30-80 scheduled for screening colonoscopy.
2. Male and female patients
3. Ambulatory patients
4. Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous colonic surgery
2. Patient with mental/physical condition that impairs oral ingestion of preparation
3. Allergy or hypersensitivity to simethicone
4. Patients with limited mobility (bedridden patients)
5. Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction
6. Patients with gastroparesis
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Antonio Mendoza-Ladd

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio H Mendoza-Ladd, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Texas Tech university Health Sciences Center El Paso

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Park JJ, Lee SK, Jang JY, Kim HJ, Kim NH. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Sep-Oct;56(94-95):1321-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19950784 (View on PubMed)

Yoo IK, Jeen YT, Kang SH, Lee JH, Kim SH, Lee JM, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Chun HJ, Lee HS, Kim CD. Improving of bowel cleansing effect for polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid using simethicone: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4163. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004163.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27428209 (View on PubMed)

Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4 Suppl):S16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.021. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16564908 (View on PubMed)

Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S, Giordanino C, Rondonotti E, Curcio G, Dulbecco P, Fabbri C, Della Casa D, Maiero S, Simone A, Iacopini F, Feliciangeli G, Manes G, Rinaldi A, Zullo A, Rogai F, Repici A. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22239959 (View on PubMed)

Moraveji S, Casner N, Bashashati M, Garcia C, Dwivedi A, Zuckerman MJ, Carrion A, Ladd AM. The role of oral simethicone on the adenoma detection rate and other quality indicators of screening colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jul;90(1):141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30926430 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E17034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.