Labial Frenulum Surgery - a Comparative Study of Conventional Scalpel and Er-Yag Laser Technique

NCT ID: NCT03104764

Last Updated: 2017-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-01

Study Completion Date

2016-01-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome in terms of wound healing time, surgery time, bleeding and patient experience of the ectomy of frenulum when performed with laser technology versus conventional scalpel technique. A prospective, single-blind, randomized and controlled study was performed. Wound healing was assessed five and ten days after after surgery. The long-term outcome were assessed blinded by a dentist not earlier involved in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children referred to a pediatric clinic to surgically remove a labial frenulum were randomized to treatment with conventional scalpel or laser treatment technology after parents and children had given consent to participate. During the surgery the time required for the procedure and the amount of bleeding the different techniques caused were measured. Wound healing was assessed five and ten days after surgery by a clinical judgement and by analysing photos. Three months after surgery an independent dentist assessed the long-term outcome by a clinical examination. The patients´ view of the treatment were assessed directly after the surgery and five days, ten days and three months after the surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labial Tie

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind investigation
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcome assessor have not met the patient before assessing the outcome. The assessor has no information about which surgical technique that is used.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Scalpel

Frenotomy performed with conventional scalpel

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Labial frenulum removed by scalpel

Er:YAG laser

Frenotomy performed with Er:YAG laser

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Er:YAG laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Labial frenulum removed by Er:YAG laser

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Scalpel

Labial frenulum removed by scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Er:YAG laser

Labial frenulum removed by Er:YAG laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients in need of frenulum labials surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with severe general diseases (ASA\>2)
* patients who required general anaesthesia for treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Public Dental Health in Uppsala Region

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Public Dental Service, Vretgränd 9

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Dnr 2014/253

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Using a Novel Skin Tag Removal Device
NCT06463613 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA