Comparison of Dual-mode ER:YAG Laser in Patients With Long Keloid/Hypertrophic Scars
NCT ID: NCT02546076
Last Updated: 2017-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of dual-mode Er:YAG laser delivering pulses either with and without heat/coagulation in a cohort of patients with long keloid/hypertrophic scars.
The main hypothesis is that ablative fractional laser without heat/coagulation is equivalent to laser with heat/coagulation in terms of scars volume reduction, while the secondary hypothesis is that ablative fractional laser without heat/coagulation is superior in terms of post-operative erythema and hypopigmentation reduction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study Between Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection Alone and Combined Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection With Either Long-pluse Nd YAG or Erbium Yag for Treating Hypertrophic or Keloid Scars
NCT07263100
Treatment of Post-Surgical Scars With Traditional Ablative Er:YAG Versus Fractional Ablative Er:YAG
NCT02397564
Effect of Nd-YAG Laser on Hypertrophic Scar
NCT06347081
Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars Using Fractional Laser and Fractional Laser-assisted Topical Corticosteroid Delivery
NCT02487212
Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars
NCT04236167
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Skin injuries, such as lacerations or abrasions, due to trauma are relatively common, and patients are very concerned about scars caused by trauma and primary repair. Multiple modalities for improving the clinical appearance of scars have been attempted with varying success, including corticosteroids, dermabrasion, surgical revision, chemical peeling, silicone gel application, pressure therapy, and radiation. Lasers such as the carbon dioxide (CO2), erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG), and pulsed dye (PDL) lasers have all been used with differing success in the treatment of scars. The goal of all these treatments is to soften depressions and stimulate neocollagenesis in order to fill in the residual defects.
Ablative lasers used for skin resurfacing, such as the CO2 and Er:YAG laser, can reduce various scars, but significant adverse effects limit their use, and patient downtime can be extensive. Owing to these potential risks, nonablative lasers have been developed as a safe alternative to ablative laser resurfacing, and have been reported to be effective and safe for scars. However outcomes have remained unsatisfactory and require several treatments to achieve satisfactory efficacy.
Recently, the use of ablative and non-ablative lasers based on the fractional approach has become a novel strategy for the treatment of scars, and some authors have suggested that treatment with fractional lasers for various scars, such as postoperative, atrophic, and acne scars, has been demonstrated to safely improve the appearance of the scars. However, there is a lack of studies comparing coagulation modality of such lasers.
Objective
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of dual-mode Er:YAG laser delivering pulses either with and without heat/coagulation in a cohort of patients with long keloid/hypertrophic scars.
Methods
This is a single center, investigator initiated, double blind, within-subject split-lesion design, equivalence randomized clinical study.
Consecutive patients, referring to Dermatology outpatient and fulfilling inclusion criteria, are included. Participants are then randomly assigned to get treatment with Er:YAG laser on half of scar section side by equally splitting the lesion area in two symmetric and uniform parts. One side will be treated with coagulation while the other one will be without. In case of multiple lesions per patient, only the largest and most uniform one is selected for the study purpose.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laser coagulation
Er:YAG laser treatment with coagulation modality
Laser coagulation
The treatment consists in performing Er:Yag laser with long-pulsed Erbium mode
Laser w/o coagulation
Er:YAG laser treatment without coagulation modality
Laser w/o coagulation
The treatment consists in performing Er:Yag laser with true pulsed Erbium mode
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laser coagulation
The treatment consists in performing Er:Yag laser with long-pulsed Erbium mode
Laser w/o coagulation
The treatment consists in performing Er:Yag laser with true pulsed Erbium mode
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Skin type I-IV
* Presence of long keloid/hypertrophic scar of at least 3 cm² and of uniform/symmetric type
* Willingness and ability to adhere study protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* Ablative resurfacing within the last 6 months on the scar
* Oral retinoid, any immunosuppressive treatments in the last 6 months
* Pregnancy, lactation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maurice Adatto, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dep. of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern (Switzerland)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KELOID
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.