Exteriorization Versus Non-exteriorization of the Uterus During Repair of Uterine Incision in a Repeated Cesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT03009994
Last Updated: 2024-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1024 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-01
2017-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Different Operational techniques For cesarean section have been defined aimed at reducing surgical time, making the surgery easier and more efficient, lowering costs,decreasing the risk of adverse effects and postoperative morbidity, as well as length of hospital stay.
Also, Intraoperative blood loss is one of important complications during cesarean section. A systematic review included twenty one studies, in 2011, revealed that increase incidence of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion with increase number of cesarean deliveries.also anemia in the pregnancy increase maternal morbidities included intraoperative blood loss. In Egypt, prevalence of Iron deficiency anemia among pregnant women about 51% of pregnant women.
After baby born by cesarean section and the placenta has been extracted, uterine incision is sutured either by temporary removal of the uterus from the abdominal cavity (exteriorization of the uterus) to facilitate uterine incision repair or it is repaired within the abdominal cavity (in situ repair). There had been few randomized controlled trials comparing intraoperative and postoperative morbidity following exteriorization of the uterus with non-exteriorization. The conclusions drawn from these trials have been conflicting.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
External Pop-Out Technique Versus Classic Head Extraction During Cesarean Section
NCT02755168
External Pop-out and Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section
NCT03598764
Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894
Digital Cervical and Cesarean Section
NCT03392077
Learning Curve of External Pop Out as a New Technique for Lower Uterine Segment Support
NCT03579511
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exteriorization group
After delivery of the fetus and placenta, the surgeon bring uterus yet out from peritoneal cavity by manual handling of the uterus uterus from fundus and extracted out of the abdominal cavity before starting to close it. After repair of the uterus , uterus returned to abdominal cavity and repair anterior abdominal wall as following.
Repair of uterine incision
Exteriorization of the uterus
Non exteriorization group
Uterine incision will be repaired intra abdominally
Repair of uterine incision
Non exteriorization of the uterus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repair of uterine incision
Exteriorization of the uterus
Non exteriorization of the uterus
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women who will undergo repeated lower segment cesarean section
Exclusion Criteria
* Placenta previa.
* Rupture uterus.
* Classical caesarean section.(upper segment cesarean section)
* Sever Preeclampsia.
* Chorioamnionitis.
* prolonged or obstructed labour.
* Fibroid.
* Polyhydramnios.
* Multiple pregnancy.
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed Khairy Ali
Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut university
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EUR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.