Double Vers Single in Cesarean Incision

NCT ID: NCT05276518

Last Updated: 2022-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-20

Study Completion Date

2023-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the effect of single versus double layer closure of caesarean scar on the residual myometrium on the short \& intermediate term.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Caesarean section is the fetal delivery through an open abdominal incision (laparotomy) and an incision in the uterus (hysterotomy). The first caesarean documented occurred in 1020 AD, and since then, the procedure has evolved tremendously. It is now the most common surgery performed in Egypt, with over 1 million women delivered by caesarean every year. The caesarean delivery rate worldwide rose from 5% in 1970 to 31.9% in 2016 An optimal uterine closure should provide better scar healing. Closure of the uterine incision needs to be considered with regards to benefit and potential harm in order to offer the best available surgical care to women undergoing caesarean section. Surgical suturing technique and mechanical tension affecting the surgical wound are the most important factors related to the incisional integrity, especially for minimizing postoperative caesarean delivery scar defects .

Currently, a low-transverse incision is the preferred method of hysterotomy during caesarean delivery. This incision has traditionally been repaired with a two-layer closure. A two-layer closure usually involves a continuous, unlocking layer of absorbable suture with an addition of adds muscular fold to cover the first layer. Studies showed that women whose uterine incisions have been closed by double-layer following caesarean section experienced greater advantages in terms of residual myometrium thickness, healing ratio (residual myometrium thickness/adjacent myometrium thickness), and dysmenorrhea .

The safe cut off thickness of scar in post LSCS uterus varies from 1.5 to 3.5 mm; the thinning of the site is the cause of worry of dehiscence scar or rupture in next pregnancy. Closure of the uterine incision is a key step in caesarean delivery, correct approximation of the cut margins is not guaranteed .

This may be possibly due to edges getting overlapped; and, after remodelling and the process of the healing, thickness of the site of incision is significantly reduced. There is also a very high possibility of inter surgeon variability. It was felt that if there is a suturing technique which ensures correct approximation of all the layers with nil or minimal possibility of inters operator variability, there will not be any thinning of lower segment caesarean section LSCS site, and scarred uterus repaired in this manner will be able to withstand the stress of labor in future .

A growing body of evidence suggests that the surgical technique for uterus closure influences uterine scar defect, but there is still no consensus about optimal uterus closure. Some techniques seem to have the potential to decrease the risk of short-term complications, while others have long-term benefits, such as reduced risk of uterine rupture. Some maternal symptoms are related to the appearance of the uterine scar, and more specifically to a niche in the caesarean scar as a surrogate marker. niche is defined as an indentation in the myometrium of ≥2 mm in depth and is detectable by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), preferably with contrast to limit false negatives. Complications in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders, are associated with thin residual myometrium .

Many variations in CS technique have been studied. For example, single-layer unlocked uterine incision closure has been compared to double-layer unlocked uterine incision closure. Double layer locked closure has compared to single-layer locked closure, Fear of scar rupture is one of risks involved in a post caesarean pregnancy .

This had led to an increased rate of repeat caesarean delivery in today's times. Closure of the uterine incision is a key step in caesarean section, and it is imperative that an optimal surgical technique be employed for closing a uterine scar. This technique should be able to withstand the stress of subsequent labor. In the existing techniques of uterine closure, single or double layer, correct approximation of the cut margins, that is, decidua-to-decidua, myometrium to myometrium, serosa to serosa is not guaranteed. Also, there are high chances of inter surgeon variability. It was felt that if a suturing technique which ensures correct approximation of all the layers mentioned above with nil or minimal possibility of inter operator variability existed, there will not be any thinning of lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). Further, a scarred uterus repaired in this manner will be able to withstand the stress of labor in future .

To assess the healing of scar and the risk of uterine rupture and other complication, ultrasonography is used in the evaluation of uterine scar 6 weeks after delivery. It has generally been found that, the thicker the uterine scar, the lower the rate of complications. This may be due to that the thicker scar is stronger, and thus performs better than a thinner one .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Scar Defect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

o Group (1): 30 cases who will undergo Two Layer Uterine Closure

o After the delivery the first group will undergo Two Layer Uterine Closure: Double-layer closure of the uterine incision will be performed using unlocked continuous Polyglactin thread sutures(1/0) for both layers, with a large portion of the myometrium and the endometrium included in the first layer. The second layer was a continuous running suture that imbricate the first layer, including serosal and myometrial tissue.

Closure of cesarean section incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After the delivery the first group will undergo Two Layer Uterine Closure:

Double-layer closure of the uterine incision will be performed using unlocked continuous Polyglactin thread sutures(1/0) for both layers, with a large portion of the myometrium and the endometrium included in the first layer. The second layer was a continuous running suture that imbricate the first layer, including serosal and myometrial tissue.

The second group will undergo continuous unlocked sutures in a single layer, Uterine closure will begin from one corner of the incision and then the uterine incision wound is closed using Polyglactin thread include endometrium, myometrium and serosa.

o Group (2): 30 cases who will undergo single layer uterine closure.

The second group will undergo continuous unlocked sutures in a single layer, Uterine closure will begin from one corner of the incision and then the uterine incision wound is closed using Polyglactin thread include endometrium, myometrium and serosa

Closure of cesarean section incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After the delivery the first group will undergo Two Layer Uterine Closure:

Double-layer closure of the uterine incision will be performed using unlocked continuous Polyglactin thread sutures(1/0) for both layers, with a large portion of the myometrium and the endometrium included in the first layer. The second layer was a continuous running suture that imbricate the first layer, including serosal and myometrial tissue.

The second group will undergo continuous unlocked sutures in a single layer, Uterine closure will begin from one corner of the incision and then the uterine incision wound is closed using Polyglactin thread include endometrium, myometrium and serosa.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Closure of cesarean section incision

After the delivery the first group will undergo Two Layer Uterine Closure:

Double-layer closure of the uterine incision will be performed using unlocked continuous Polyglactin thread sutures(1/0) for both layers, with a large portion of the myometrium and the endometrium included in the first layer. The second layer was a continuous running suture that imbricate the first layer, including serosal and myometrial tissue.

The second group will undergo continuous unlocked sutures in a single layer, Uterine closure will begin from one corner of the incision and then the uterine incision wound is closed using Polyglactin thread include endometrium, myometrium and serosa.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Singleton pregnancy.
* Gestational age between 37 completed weeks to 42 weeks.
* Patients undergoing elective primary caesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women who declined to participate.
* History of uterine surgery (e.g. hysterotomy, myomectomy, perforation, caesarean section).
* Presence of maternal disease (diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disorders, uterine malformations).
* Women Diagnosed with Placenta Accreta Spectrum during the current pregnancy
* Multiple pregnancy.
* Chorioamnionitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sara AbdelRazek Ramadan Hamad

The principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Hamed, Asst . Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sara abdelrazik Ramadan hamad

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sara Abdelrazik, Bachelor

Role: CONTACT

01092762108

Mohamed Hamed, Asst . Prof

Role: CONTACT

01226067272

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sara Abdelrazik, Bachelor

Role: primary

01092762108

Mohamed Hamad, MD

Role: backup

01226067272

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3/3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3