Knot Burial Technique for Rectus Sheath Closure

NCT ID: NCT04156282

Last Updated: 2019-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

358 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-09

Study Completion Date

2019-10-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Caesarean section is one of the most commonly performed abdominal operations on women in most countries of the world. Its rate has increased markedly in recent years, and is about 20-25% of all child-births in most developed countries.

The present study was a step to reduce postoperative pain in cesarean sections. Because of the large number of women that undergo caesarean section, even small differences in post-operative morbidity rates due to different techniques could translate into improved health and significant savings of cost and health services resources.

Closing the rectus sheath in cesarean sections with the knots pricking through the skin causes significant postoperative pain, discomfort and delayed ambulation. No comments in literature regarding the best way for closing the rectus sheath in cesarean sections.

AIM/ OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of burying knots beneath the rectus sheath during cesarean section in reducing post operative pain and discomfort.

Study hypothesis:

In women undergoing cesarean sections may or may not burying knots beneath the rectus sheath reduce the post operative pain and discomfort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Non absorbable and delayed absorbable monofilament materials require meticulous care to prevent knot slippage.

One common problem that arises from use of these materials is the discomfort caused by the knot pricking through the skin. Although this is a common problem after cesarean section, it is often overlooked and only very few preventive techniques have been described.

This study is to assess the efficacy of burying knots beneath the rectus sheath during cesarean sections in reducing post operative pain and discomfort.

Type of Study : A randomized controlled clinical trial. Study Setting :this study will be conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ain-Shams University Maternity hospital.

Study time: 2019. Study Population : The study population comprises pregnant women, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, attending to Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, during the study period, who are planned for cesarean delivery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

we will analyze 400 candidate for elective cesarean sections, divided into two groups ,each of 200 patients according to the rectus sheath closure:
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

classical closure.

In this group, the rectus sheath closure will be done by simple running continuous sutures with the knots beneath the subcutaneous layer.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

classical closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgical suturing intervention

knot burial technique

The surgeon holds the left angle of the rectus sheath incision with an Allis. Using (Polyglactin 910) suture,The needle is taken from the inside outward on the upper edge.The needle is then taken lateral to the Allis and brought back into the wound by taking it through the inferior edge from outside to inside . A square knot is tied with three or four throws. The needle is then taken out of the wound through the upper edge and continuous running stitches . As the right angle is approached, the angle is held with an Allis. the suture, will be taken through the lower edge, is brought outside the wound and passed between the blades of a closed Allis before taking it inside out on the upper edge. One more bite is taken but this time just lateral to the Allis holding the angle, and the needle is brought back into the wound and to the outside between the edges of the rectus sheath. Using the loop of polyglactin held with the Allis , an Aberdeen knot is tied after removing the Allis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

knot burial technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgical suturing intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

knot burial technique

surgical suturing intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

classical closure

surgical suturing intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Term pregnancy ( more than 37 weeks of gestation ) candidate for transverse incision elective cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

* patient with BMI \>30 and fat thickness \>3 cm.
* patient with haemoglobin less than 10g/dL
* patient with previous history of septic wound.
* Emergency lower segment cesarean section.
* Patients complaining of premature rupture of membrane.
* Patients need intra abdominal drains post cesarean sections
* Patients with established or gestational diabetes, coagulation defects, hemodynamic instability, septicemia or chorioamnionitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aliaa Ibrahim Gaber Elsayed

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nashwa elsaid, prof.Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AinShams University

Reda Mokhtar, Lecture

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AinShams University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ahmed Ibrahim

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FWA 0000175858

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3