External Pop-out and Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT03598764
Last Updated: 2020-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
910 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2019-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A multitude of efforts had been done aiming at a reduction of cesarean section related maternal morbidities; most of them are related to technical modifications of how to open and how to close the abdominal and uterine incisions. The comparative studies of blunt versus sharp extension of the uterine incision showed a reduction of the incidence of unintended extension from 8.8% to 4.8%.
Delivery of the fetal head through the uterine incision is one of the major technical problems during elective cesarean section, especially when the presenting part is non-engaged. All of the previously described procedures, alternative to the classic manual head extraction, were inconclusive and not convincing to the obstetricians for routine use.
Also, no reported well-designed trials favor one of them over other. Application of vacuum cup, use of forceps blade, increasing fundal pressure and making additional uterine incisions were previously reported as alternative techniques. None of them gain any popularity or proved to be used as a basic step during cesarean section, besides many complications were reported due to their use on mothers and infants.
The vulnerability of the lower uterine segment for tears is related to the stage of labor. The frequency of unintended extension was reported to be 15.5%, and 35.0% in cases operated in first and second stages of labor respectively.
As with any surgical operation, anticipating difficulties during cesarean delivery and avoiding these difficulties is always the greatest practice. Although much has been written about techniques for managing difficult head extraction during vaginal deliveries, the reports addressed the management of difficult head delivery during cesarean section in literature are scarce.
The original techniques of fetal head extraction entail the introduction of the obstetricians hand or other instruments into the lower uterine segment. This puts the lower uterine segment at risk of damage and incision extensions with its consequences of increased blood loss, increased operative time, infection, adhesion and blood transfusion. Adherence to the available the generated good quality evidence bases practice in cesarean section is anticipated to decrease such morbidities.
The idea of the present technique was derived from the fact that during vaginal delivery the main task of the obstetrician is to support the perineum while the fetal head extends to get out through birth canal.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
External Pop-Out Technique Versus Classic Head Extraction During Cesarean Section
NCT02755168
External Pop Out cs vs Conventional Method for Fetal Head Extraction in Repeatedcaesarean Section.
NCT04968340
Learning Curve of External Pop Out as a New Technique for Lower Uterine Segment Support
NCT03579511
Exteriorization Versus Non-exteriorization of the Uterus During Repair of Uterine Incision in a Repeated Cesarean Section
NCT03009994
Push With Lower Uterine Segment Support
NCT02934516
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Classic head extraction group
Classic head extraction during Cesarean section
by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head
External Pop out group
External pop out technique
The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Classic head extraction during Cesarean section
by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head
External pop out technique
The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Women eligible for elective Cesarean section.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Placenta previa
3. Fetal congenital anomalies as hydrocephalus
4. Intrauterine fetal death.
5. US evidence anhydramnios
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed Khairy Ali
Lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Women Health Hospital - Assiut university
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EPCS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.