External Pop-out and Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT03598764

Last Updated: 2020-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

910 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cesarean section is the delivery of the fetus through a surgical incision in the abdominal wall (laparotomy) and uterine wall (hysterotomy). The rate of cesarean delivery has increased progressively in the last decades until it becomes the most common operation performed all over the world.

A multitude of efforts had been done aiming at a reduction of cesarean section related maternal morbidities; most of them are related to technical modifications of how to open and how to close the abdominal and uterine incisions. The comparative studies of blunt versus sharp extension of the uterine incision showed a reduction of the incidence of unintended extension from 8.8% to 4.8%.

Delivery of the fetal head through the uterine incision is one of the major technical problems during elective cesarean section, especially when the presenting part is non-engaged. All of the previously described procedures, alternative to the classic manual head extraction, were inconclusive and not convincing to the obstetricians for routine use.

Also, no reported well-designed trials favor one of them over other. Application of vacuum cup, use of forceps blade, increasing fundal pressure and making additional uterine incisions were previously reported as alternative techniques. None of them gain any popularity or proved to be used as a basic step during cesarean section, besides many complications were reported due to their use on mothers and infants.

The vulnerability of the lower uterine segment for tears is related to the stage of labor. The frequency of unintended extension was reported to be 15.5%, and 35.0% in cases operated in first and second stages of labor respectively.

As with any surgical operation, anticipating difficulties during cesarean delivery and avoiding these difficulties is always the greatest practice. Although much has been written about techniques for managing difficult head extraction during vaginal deliveries, the reports addressed the management of difficult head delivery during cesarean section in literature are scarce.

The original techniques of fetal head extraction entail the introduction of the obstetricians hand or other instruments into the lower uterine segment. This puts the lower uterine segment at risk of damage and incision extensions with its consequences of increased blood loss, increased operative time, infection, adhesion and blood transfusion. Adherence to the available the generated good quality evidence bases practice in cesarean section is anticipated to decrease such morbidities.

The idea of the present technique was derived from the fact that during vaginal delivery the main task of the obstetrician is to support the perineum while the fetal head extends to get out through birth canal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Classic head extraction group

Group Type OTHER

Classic head extraction during Cesarean section

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head

External Pop out group

Group Type OTHER

External pop out technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Classic head extraction during Cesarean section

by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External pop out technique

The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant women in single, living, term (\>37 weeks), cephalic fetus.
2. Women eligible for elective Cesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Multiple gestations
2. Placenta previa
3. Fetal congenital anomalies as hydrocephalus
4. Intrauterine fetal death.
5. US evidence anhydramnios
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammed Khairy Ali

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women Health Hospital - Assiut university

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPCS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.