Comparison of Uterine Exteriorization Versus in Situ Repair at Cesarean Section: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT00550888
Last Updated: 2010-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-08-31
2007-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Two-Layered Simple Interrupted Myometrial Suturing Reduces Uterine Niche Formation After Primary Cesarean Section
NCT07229222
Impact of Double-layer Versus Single-layer Uterine Closure Suture in Cesarean Section on the Development of Postoperative Uterine Scar Deficiency
NCT03039803
The Influence of Endometrial Suturing on the Risk of Uterine Scar Defect
NCT03851003
Assessment of the Effect of Rectus Muscle Reapproximation Versus Non Reapproximation During CS on Postoperative Pain
NCT04108975
Suture Material for Closure of Hysterotomy
NCT03026647
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
suture techniques
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* gestational age \> 24 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
* chorioamnionitis
* hemorrhagic complications
* unable to consent
* previous abdominal surgery
13 Years
44 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eronildo F Silva
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IMIP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IMIP Prof. Fernando Figueira
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coutinho IC, Ramos de Amorim MM, Katz L, Bandeira de Ferraz AA. Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):639-47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816521e2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMIP1234
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.