Incidence of Caesarean Scar Defect in Cases of Cesarean Section With and Without Bladder Flap Dissection

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-07

Study Completion Date

2024-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anatomically Uterine niche is an iatrogenic pouch-like defect at the site of previous caesarean scar due to defective tissue healing. Radiologically niche should be defined as an indentation at the site of the CS scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. A niche can be subclassified in: (1) simple niche; (2) simple niche with one branch; (3) complex niche (with more than one branch). (1-3) Uterine niche occurs in up to 70% women with previous cesarean of whom 30% are symptomatic. Reported prevalence varies: 24-70% with transvaginal sonography (TVS) and 56-84% with gel/saline instillation sonohysterography (SHG).This may be an underestimation because many women are asymptomatic and also because clinicians may not recognize niche as a cause of symptoms due to unawareness. Prevalence of 45.6% was reported in a prospective observational study (n = 371) where sonohysterography was done six months post-cesarean. Prevalence increases with increasing number of previous cesareans. (1-5) Potential Risk Factors Niche forms due to poor healing of cesarean scar. Risk factors are: (5-8)

1. Factors Affecting Lower Uterine Segment:

Cervical dilatation of \> 5 cm, \> 5 h duration of labour and advanced fetal station predispose to large niche due to thinner or less vascularized myometrium resulting in inadequate healing(5,6)
2. Level of Uterine Incision Lower uterine incision towards the cervix results in poor healing, as mucus secreted by cervical glands interferes with myometrial approximation. Mucus accumulation gradually increases the niche size also (5,7) Cesarean section done in advanced labour after cervical effacement and also creation of uterovesical fold of peritoneum influence the level of uterine incision.
3. Uterine Closure Techniques Single-layer, decidua sparing closure technique predisposes to incomplete closure, compared to single full-thickness closure. A strong myometrial scar with proper anatomical approximation without tissue strangulation minimizes risk of niches (1,8) If muscular edges are thick, they are best approximated by including deeper part in the first layer and the remaining superficial cut edges in the second layer.

Non-perpendicular sutures leading to an irregular myometrial closure, locking sutures or very tight second layer leading to ischemic necrosis result in poorly healed scar predisposing to niche formation.

Thus, double-layer uterine closure using non-locking sutures is the optimal closure technique that results in thicker residual myometrium and hence potentially lower risk of niches.

Suboptimal surgical techniques: Inadequate haemostasis, tissue ischemia, devascularization and excessive tissue manipulation contribute to poor scar healing and adhesions, consequently forming niche.
4. Adhesions Adhesion formation with abdominal wall pulls the uterine scar towards abdominal wall, exerting counteracting force opposite to the direction of retracting uterine scar tissue and causing impaired wound healing. This mechanism is encountered in non closure of peritoneum and creation of bladder flap that is not sutured. (7)
5. Retroflexed Uterus Effect of gravity on uterine corpus also increases counteracting forces. Large niches are mostly found with retroflexed uterus. (6,7)
6. Patient Factors Genetic predisposition contributes to impaired healing, inflammation, or adhesion formation, post-operative infection. (7) Gestational diabetes (odds ratio, 1.73), previous caesarean (OR, 3.14) and advanced body mass index (OR, 1.06) are independent risk factors. Risk increases by 6% for every additional unit increase in body mass index. (8)

Diagnosis:

Niche can be visualized in non-pregnant state using TVS, SHG, 3-D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or hysteroscopy. An anechoic space at least 2 mm deep in the myometrium at caesarean scar site clinches the diagnosis. Niche Size and Residual Myometrium thickness are measured.

Residual myometrial thickness (RMT) is the vertical distance between uterine serosa and apex of defect. Large niches are defined when RMT is \< 50% of adjacent myometrium or ≤ 2.2 mm on TVS. Absent residual myometrium is termed a total defect. (9,10)

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Sparse Uterine Closure in Cesarean Section

NCT03930134

Caesarean Scar Defect

COMPLETED NA

Uterine Scar Resection During Repeat Cesarean Delivery to Prevent Uterine Niche Formation

NCT07228858

Cesarean Section Complications Scar Niche Scarred Uterus

COMPLETED NA

Incidence of Uterine Cesarean Scar Niche After Cesarean Delivery

NCT05900492

Cesarean Section Dehiscence

UNKNOWN

A Two-Layered Simple Interrupted Myometrial Suturing Reduces Uterine Niche Formation After Primary Cesarean Section

NCT07229222

Cesarean Section Complications Scar Niche Myometrial Remodeling +1 more

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Cesarean Section Scar Niche: The Impact on ART Outcome

NCT05358678

Cesarean Section ART

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CS Scar Defect(Niche) How to Avoid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

closed envelope

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dissection of bladder flap for CS

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bladder flap dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bladder flap dissection during caesarean section

no dissection of bladder flap for CS

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bladder flap dissection

bladder flap dissection during caesarean section

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1- Patients who will undergo cesarean section for the first time (primi section)

Exclusion Criteria

* 1- Patient with excessive adhesion that necessitate bladder dissection 2- Previous uterine surgery e.g. myomectomy 3- Patient with comorbidities affecting wound healing e.g. diabetes, autoimmune diseases , immunosuppression 4- Patient in active labour with cervical dilatation \> 5cm

Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes