The Application of Pleth Variability Index in Continuous Monitoring the Volume Status of Intraoperative Patients

NCT ID: NCT03009669

Last Updated: 2017-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the value of using pleth variability index(PVI) to monitor the patient's intra-operative volume status continuously by observing the application of stroke volume variation(SVV) and PVI and their correlation in patients undergoing intestinal tumor surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To assess the value of using PVI to monitor the patient's intra-operative volume status continuously by observing the application of stroke volume variation(SVV) and pleth variability index(PVI) and their correlation in patients undergoing intestinal tumor surgeries.

Methods: 50 patients undergoing elective intestinal tumor surgery were enrolled, ASAⅠ-Ⅲ, aged 18-65 years. After the induction of general anesthesia, cardiac index(CI), cardiac output(CO), stroke volume variability(SVV), stroke volume index(SVI) were monitored with Vigileo system, while pleth variability index(PVI) and perfusion index(PI) were monitored with Massion Radical 7 system. During the surgery, goal directed fluid therapy was conducted according to the data of CI、SVI and SVV. Heart rate(HR), mean arterial pressure(MAP), central venous pressure(CVP), CO, CI, SVI, SVV, PI, PVI were recorded while after the induction of anesthesia(T1), making surgical incision(T2), performing intestinal anastomosis(T3) and closing the abdominal incision(T4). And we calculate the correlation of SVV and PVI using Pearson Correlation Analysis at different time points.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodynamic Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing elective intestinal tumor surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of grade I-Ⅲ
* Aged 18-65 years
* BMI 18\~30kg/㎡

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years or above 65 years
* patients with severe aortic regurgitation
* patients with permanent cardiac arrhythmias
* patients with intra-aortic balloon pump
* patients with severe pulmonary disease
* patients undergoing emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lin Yang

attending physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shu HaiHua, doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brandstrup B. Fluid therapy for the surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;20(2):265-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.10.007.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16850777 (View on PubMed)

Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):1093-1106. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148691.33690.AC.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15781528 (View on PubMed)

Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15983453 (View on PubMed)

Strunden MS, Heckel K, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. Perioperative fluid and volume management: physiological basis, tools and strategies. Ann Intensive Care. 2011 Mar 21;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21906324 (View on PubMed)

Samra T, Arya VK. Comparison of cardiac output estimation by FloTrac/Vigileo TM and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patient with Takayasu arteritis. Ann Card Anaesth. 2011 May-Aug;14(2):163-4. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.81579. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21636945 (View on PubMed)

Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):487-97. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.008. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20022261 (View on PubMed)

Mathews L, Singh RK. Cardiac output monitoring. Ann Card Anaesth. 2008 Jan-Jun;11(1):56-68. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.38455.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18182765 (View on PubMed)

Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Joseph P, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):832-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507001056. Epub 2007 Aug 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17666154 (View on PubMed)

Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, Huneke R, Schalte G, Autschbach R, Rossaint R, Buhre W. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Dec;93(6):782-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh280. Epub 2004 Oct 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15465840 (View on PubMed)

Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003 Nov;124(5):1900-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.5.1900.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14605066 (View on PubMed)

Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R18. doi: 10.1186/cc8875. Epub 2010 Feb 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20156348 (View on PubMed)

Haas S, Trepte C, Hinteregger M, Fahje R, Sill B, Herich L, Reuter DA. Prediction of volume responsiveness using pleth variability index in patients undergoing cardiac surgery after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):696-701. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1410-x. Epub 2012 May 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22588287 (View on PubMed)

Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20035228 (View on PubMed)

Desgranges FP, Desebbe O, Ghazouani A, Gilbert K, Keller G, Chiari P, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ, Cannesson M. Influence of the site of measurement on the ability of plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):329-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer165. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21680600 (View on PubMed)

Monnet X, Teboul JL. Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):549-53. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282ec68b2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17762234 (View on PubMed)

Sandroni C, Cavallaro F, Marano C, Falcone C, De Santis P, Antonelli M. Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1429-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2621-1. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22732902 (View on PubMed)

Schoonjans A, Forget P, Labriola L, Deneys V, Jadoul M, Pingaut I, De Kock M. Pleth variability index combined with passive leg raising-induced pulse pressure variation to detect hypovolemia in spontaneously breathing patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2010;61(3):147-50.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21268570 (View on PubMed)

Takeyama M, Matsunaga A, Kakihana Y, Masuda M, Kuniyoshi T, Kanmura Y. Impact of skin incision on the pleth variability index. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011 Aug;25(4):215-21. doi: 10.1007/s10877-011-9298-9. Epub 2011 Sep 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21928109 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H20160049(01)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.