The Effect of Structured Feedback on Live Surgical Performance

NCT ID: NCT02986217

Last Updated: 2022-10-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 47 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2016-12-31
• Study Completion Date: 2019-02-28

Brief Summary

This study seeks to establish the effect of regular structured feedback on surgical performance using crowd sourced video assessments with validated objective performance scores and time to complete a specific surgical procedure through a randomized controlled trial. The working hypothesis is that regular structured assessment will lead to a greater measurable improvement in performance, as defined by objective performance scores, than will traditional feedback methods.

Detailed Description

The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have endeavored to implement structure and standardization for the fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgical programs (FMIGS) and obstetric and gynecology residency programs respectively. Educational objectives are explicitly delineated. Though the fellowship and residency educational objectives are well rounded, and include the development of skills to become leaders and educators in the field of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) and general obstetrics and gynecology, one of the main objective of the fellowship and residency training is the attainment of surgical skill. This is ensured by a requirement for a breadth of surgical exposure including vaginal surgery, hysteroscopy, traditional laparoscopy, management of surgical complications, minimally invasive hysterectomy, urogynecologic procedures, gastrointestinal surgery, urinary tract surgery, reproductive surgery, and the surgical management of common gynecologic conditions such as endometriosis. Minimum case requirements have been implemented to provide guidance for FMIGS and residency programs. In addition, trainees are required to log surgical cases and this information is utilized for FMIGS and residency program site inspections as well as for feedback of surgical competency. Despite standardization efforts by the AAGL and ACGME, the FMIGS and obstetric and gynecology residency curriculums are still in evolution. There is likely still great variation in surgical exposure between programs. In addition, though regular feedback is a requirement of training programs, the process is likely unstructured and subjective; based on case logs, self-assessments, and feedback by faculty surgeons. There is thus a critical need to develop a standardized, objective, timely, and actionable feedback methodology to facilitate program oversight and ensure FMIGS fellows and obstetrics and gynecology residents are achieving surgical competency throughout their training. In the absence of such structured feedback models, it will remain difficult to optimize FMIGS fellowship and obstetrics and gynecology resident training, and provide objective measurements of the impact of such training on surgical performance and patient outcomes. .

The long-term goal of this study is to assist in developing methods for surgical assessment that facilitate program oversight, allow fellows, residents, and program directors to identify specific skill sets in need of improvement, monitor progress in skill acquisition, and clearly and objectively document achievement of milestones throughout training. The study's overall objective is to determine how consistent structured feedback using crowd sourcing impacts time to complete a task as well as surgical performance as measured by GOALS and GEARS scores. The central hypothesis is that fellows and residents who receive consistent structured feedback over a sustained period of time will have shorter task times, overall improved performance, and greater satisfaction than fellows and residents receiving traditional feedback. The rationale for this work is that it will provide focus and supportive data for large-scale studies of surgical skill acquisition and development.

This study seeks to establish the effect of regular structured feedback on surgical performance using crowd sourced video assessments with GOALS and GEARS through a randomized controlled trial. The study hypothesizes regular structured assessment will lead to a greater measurable improvement in performance, as defined by change and GOALS and GEARS scores, than will traditional feedback methods as well as time to complete a specific procedure.

Conditions

Surgical Education

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Control Group

Participants randomized to the Control Group will submit a video of surgical performance of vaginal cuff closure during a hysterectomy. Subjects in the control group will receive traditional feedback methods as determined by each participant's training program. Subjects in the control group will repeat the process of video submission of the same procedure using the same surgical approach every 2 weeks for 2 cycles. At 6 weeks, participants will submit a final video performing vaginal cuff closure during hysterectomy.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental Group

Participants randomized to the Experimental Group will submit a video of surgical performance of vaginal cuff closure during a hysterectomy. Subjects in the experimental group will then receive feedback within 5 business days of video submission and repeat the process of video submission of the same procedure using the same surgical approach every 2 weeks for 2 cycles. At 6 weeks, participants will submit a final video performing vaginal cuff closure during hysterectomy.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

regular structured assessment of surgical performance

Intervention Type: OTHER

Interventions

regular structured assessment of surgical performance

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• current position as a resident in obstetrics and gynecology in a year of training where laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is regularly performed -- OR -- FMIGS Fellow regularly performing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy
• participants must be between 18 and 60 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

• persons not in a position as a resident in obstetrics and gynecology in a year of training where laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is regularly performed -- OR -- persons not a FMIGS Fellow regularly performing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy
• participants younger than 18 and older than 60 years of age

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 60 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

George Washington University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

101614

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id