The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Fusion The IVANOS-study

NCT ID: NCT02895555

Last Updated: 2024-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudicatio(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc.

Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation.

Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.

The investigators want to se whether i-FACTOR improves clinical outcomes compared to using allograft in spinal fusion in the elderly, and thereby find an improved methods operating this difficult patient population.

The hypothesis is, that there is no difference in clinical outcomes whether you use i-FACTOR or allograft i non-instrumented spinal fusion surgery in patients with spinal stenosis due to degenerative listhesis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Se above

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Allograft group, standard treatment

Control group, standard treatment. Approx 50 g pr level fused.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Allograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Approx 50 g of allograft bone in the fused site

i-FACTOR

i-FACTOR putty in the operation site. Fda approved. Approx 5 ml pr level fused.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

i-FACTOR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Between 5-10 CC i-FACTOR putty mixed with local harvested autograft pr level spondylodesis compared to 30 grams of allograft pr level mixed with local harvested allograft.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

i-FACTOR

Between 5-10 CC i-FACTOR putty mixed with local harvested autograft pr level spondylodesis compared to 30 grams of allograft pr level mixed with local harvested allograft.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Allograft

Approx 50 g of allograft bone in the fused site

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

P15

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Spinal stenosis, listhesis grade 1-2 (\>3 mm), facet joint arthrosis and flavum hypertrophia verified by a mr-scan and x-ray including maximally 2 levels ranging from L1-S1.
2. A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
3. Signed informed content.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any disease demanding obligate thromboprophylaxis treatment, including mechanical valve, (DVT with cancer/thrombophilia, AMI, apoplexia cerebri, TCI, valve-operation)\< 3 months, coronar metal stent \< 6 weeks and coronar drug eluted/coated stent \< 12 months.
2. Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valve prothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
3. Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age \> 75 years, EF \< 35 %.
4. Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
5. Ongoing chemotherapy.
6. Fracture i the lower back within a year prior to inclusion.
7. Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
8. Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
9. Dementia assessed by the MMSE
10. ASA 3+4
11. Age below 60 years.
12. Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
13. The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
14. Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
15. Haematologic disease. -
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ortotech

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

CeraPedics, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karen Højmark Hansen

Research coordinator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mikkel Andersen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of spine surgery of Southern Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Middelfart spine surgery research department

Middelfart, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20180146

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20120012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The NORDSTEN Studies/ The Spinal Stenosis Study
NCT02007083 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA