The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Fusion The IVANOS-study
NCT ID: NCT02895555
Last Updated: 2024-04-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation.
Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.
The investigators want to se whether i-FACTOR improves clinical outcomes compared to using allograft in spinal fusion in the elderly, and thereby find an improved methods operating this difficult patient population.
The hypothesis is, that there is no difference in clinical outcomes whether you use i-FACTOR or allograft i non-instrumented spinal fusion surgery in patients with spinal stenosis due to degenerative listhesis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Spondylodesis Operation in the Elderly With Spinal Stenosis Due to Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01618435
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981
Prospective i-FactorTM Analysis Fusion Rate and Quality of Life
NCT04610021
Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
NCT06335511
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Allograft group, standard treatment
Control group, standard treatment. Approx 50 g pr level fused.
Allograft
Approx 50 g of allograft bone in the fused site
i-FACTOR
i-FACTOR putty in the operation site. Fda approved. Approx 5 ml pr level fused.
i-FACTOR
Between 5-10 CC i-FACTOR putty mixed with local harvested autograft pr level spondylodesis compared to 30 grams of allograft pr level mixed with local harvested allograft.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
i-FACTOR
Between 5-10 CC i-FACTOR putty mixed with local harvested autograft pr level spondylodesis compared to 30 grams of allograft pr level mixed with local harvested allograft.
Allograft
Approx 50 g of allograft bone in the fused site
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. A score of 6 and more on Konno´s "History of Examination Characteristic".
3. Signed informed content.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Atrial fibrillation and one of the following: Mitral stenosis, valve prothesis and apoplexia cerebri/TCI.
3. Atrial fibrillation and two of the following: Heart insufficient, HT, DM, age \> 75 years, EF \< 35 %.
4. Known cancer in the axial skeleton.
5. Ongoing chemotherapy.
6. Fracture i the lower back within a year prior to inclusion.
7. Reduced distance of walking due to non-spinal related causes.
8. Candidate for more than two-level intervention.
9. Dementia assessed by the MMSE
10. ASA 3+4
11. Age below 60 years.
12. Missed 3 months of conservative treatment without success
13. The use of steroids and bisphosphonates.
14. Prior radiotherapy to the lower back.
15. Haematologic disease. -
60 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ortotech
UNKNOWN
CeraPedics, Inc
INDUSTRY
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karen Højmark Hansen
Research coordinator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mikkel Andersen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of spine surgery of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Middelfart spine surgery research department
Middelfart, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20180146
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20120012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.