Memory Rehabilitation by Means of Working Memory Training in Combination With a Recollection Training

NCT ID: NCT02790151

Last Updated: 2016-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Memory deficits after brain damage are common and there is still a need for evaluated therapy methods. In this study we compare two therapeutic interventions and investigate whether therapy effects can be found on neuropsychological tests and on a test measuring memory in everyday life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the interventiongroup a computerbased working memory training is combined with a recollection training (repitition-lag procedure). The patients in the active control group undergo the standard memory therapy that is normally provided in the rehabilitation centre (with a focus on the acquisition and execution of different memory strategies, e.g. the spaced retrieval method). The patients in both groups are tested on different neuropsychological tests before and after nine hours of therapy. Additionally, a test is conducted that assesses memory in everyday life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Memory Deficits

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Therapy

Learning and practicing memory strategies

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Learning and practicing Memory strategies

Experimental Intervention

Computerbased working memory training and Recollection training

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Computerbased Working Memory Training in Combination with a Recollection Training

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard Therapy

Learning and practicing Memory strategies

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Experimental Intervention

Computerbased Working Memory Training in Combination with a Recollection Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* brain injury
* memory deficits (performance below average in the California Verbal Learning Test in learning trial 1 or 5, sfr or lfr)

Exclusion Criteria

* severe amnesia (less than 2 words in sfr of the CVLT), dementia, sensory or motor aphasia, impaired vision, insufficient German language skills, lack of patient's consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oldenburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kim Merle Richter

MSc Psychologie

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Helmut Hildebrandt, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universität Oldenburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehabilitationszentrum GmbH

Oldenburg, Deutschland, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Richter KM, Modden C, Eling P, Hildebrandt H. Improving everyday memory performance after acquired brain injury: An RCT on recollection and working memory training. Neuropsychology. 2018 Jul;32(5):586-596. doi: 10.1037/neu0000445. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29697993 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UOLDENBURG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Neural Substrates for Working Memory Training
NCT03012269 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3