How Does STN-DBS Influence Emotional Conflict Decision in Parkinson's Disease: a EEG Study
NCT ID: NCT02786680
Last Updated: 2016-06-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation on Neuropsychiatric Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT04608123
Electrophysiological Activity of the Subthalamic Nucleus During the Processing of Emotional and Motivational Information
NCT01537224
Deep Brain Stimulation and Parkinson's Disease
NCT02795663
Mapping and Manipulating the Emotional Territories of the Basal Ganglia in PD Patients
NCT01267409
Local Fields Potentientals of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT05820425
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Stroop Test is a tool that allows exploring selective attention, cognitive conflict resolution (inhibition of irrelevant reading automatism) and processing speed, and is usually applied to evaluate executive functions. A modified version, the facial Emotional Stroop (ES), was developed in order to address the interference of irrelevant affective distractors. With this task, the authors demonstrated in healthy volunteers, that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the amygdala are the areas implicated in emotional conflict monitoring whereas rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) activation associates with emotional conflict resolution through a top-down inhibition of the amygdala in order to avoid the interference of new irrelevant emotional distracters. The same group designed a variant of the task by adding non-emotional cognitive trials in which subjects had to identify the gender of the faces instead of the affect. Through this paradigm, they were able to dissociate neural nets involved in cognitive conflict resolution from those specifically involved in emotional conflict resolution. Hence, while lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) was shown to resolve non-emotional conflict, the pregenual part of the anterior cingulate cortex, that is, the rACC is involved in emotional conflict resolution. On the contrary, the detection of both types of conflict share activation of a common region of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
By using the ES task, our group has recently demonstrated in a functional MRI study with PD patients that dopamine modulates emotional conflict resolution by "normalizing" the activity of rACC, which was hypoactivate in the off-drug state compared to the on-drug state and to healthy controls. The rACC receives massive dopamine projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), and thus is part of the cortico-subcortical limbic loop. Therefore, these findings would support the implication of this circuitry in emotional decoding disturbances in PD and match with the hypothesis proposed that dopaminergic mesolimbic degeneration would underlie mood manifestations and psychic NMF of the disorder. It is well demonstrated that STN-DBS improves levodopa-sensitive motor symptoms of PD. STN-DBS does not change overall cognitive function, except for some impairment in executive functions like verbal fluency but, in an experimental scenario, it has been proved to increase impulsivity during cognitive tasks in PD patients. However, its clinical effect in the affective domain of PD is highly controversial and there is only very limited data regarding emotional processing. A few available studies comparing patients before and after surgery point to a worsening in facial emotion and prosody recognition. These findings could not be replicated in a more recent work. Such studies however do not take into account the desensitization of the dopaminergic system related to marked decrease in medication after STN DBS. Because of the major changes in dopaminergic treatment and chronic desensitization all studies which do not compare stimulation conditions should be interpreted very cautiously. In our opinion, due to the large available clinical data that demonstrate behavioral changes after STN-DBS, and considering the anatomic overlapping of STN functional subdivisions, it is likely that stimulation would exert some effect over the limbic basal ganglia loop even with electrodes that are well implanted in the sensorimotor territory and thus, induce changes in both motor and affective domains, even though with some dissociation.
With this rationale, the investigators aim to reproduce in an electrophysiological perspective the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evidences of limbic cortical regions involvement in emotional decoding processes and to differentiate them from those involved in cognitive conflict. In addition, the investigators want to confirm dopamine modulation when dealing with emotional conflict, and elucidate STN-DBS effect in behavioral and cortical electrophysiological terms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
stroop test in condition DBS off
Condition 1 : On Med /Off Stim
stroop test in condition DBS on
Patients were evaluated in DBS On
stroop test in condition DBS on
Condition 2 : On Med /On Stim
stroop test in condition DBS off
Patients were evaluated in DBS Off
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
stroop test in condition DBS off
Patients were evaluated in DBS Off
stroop test in condition DBS on
Patients were evaluated in DBS On
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healthy controls without neurologic pathology
* Age between 18 and 70 years
* Fluent in French
* Signed informed consent
* Patients covered by national health insurance
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under psychotropic treatments without significant adverse event.
* MATTIS \< 130
* For Healthy controls MRI anormality
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Krack, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Grenoble
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-A01392-45
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.