Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore)

NCT ID: NCT02766842

Last Updated: 2017-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diagnosis of lesions of pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, such as lymph nodes, is still showing advancements especially with the increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for these lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare between the currently used, ProCore needles and the new biopsy needle, SharkCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis and evaluation of lesions of the pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, including lymph nodes. Cytology specimens provided from FNA cannot fully characterize certain neoplasms such as lymphomas or mesenchymal tumors. Core biopsy specimens for histological examinations are needed to provide accurate diagnoses.

ProCore needles (ProCore, Wilson-Cook Medical Inc. Winston-Salem, NC) were designed to obtain histological and cytological samples. Studies comparing ProCore needles with standard FNA needles showed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy, histological core tissue procurement or mean number of passes.

To overcome the above mentioned limitations (mainly suboptimal core tissue procurement rates), a new novel SharkCore needle (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA, USA) has been designed and approved for clinical human use by the FDA.

The objective of the study is to compare the new EUS guided histology biopsy needle SharkCore to the currently used EUS histology needle, ProCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mesenchymal Tumor Autoimmune Pancreatitis Lymphoma Solid Tumors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS-FNB with ProCore needle

General anesthesia or conscious sedation will be started and an upper endoscopic ultrasound will be inserted into the participants mouth and advanced to the site of the lesion. The lesion will be punctured by the ProCore needle, then the stylet is completely removed, and negative suction pressure is applied using a 10 ml syringe for 30 seconds while the needle is stationary with the target. Then, the needle is moved back and forth several times within the target, utilizing the fanning technique. Finally, suction is released by closing the lock of the syringe and the needle is removed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EUS-FNB with ProCore needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The use of the standard ProCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

ProCore needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

This is the standard needle used currently to procure tissue from lesions under endoscopic ultrasound guidance

EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle

The procedure will be done in the same manner with same endoscopic technique and method of tissue procurement. The only difference will be using the SharkCore needle to acquire tissue.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The use of new SharkCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

SharkCore needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

This is the new FDA approved needle for tissue procurement under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS-FNB with ProCore needle

The use of the standard ProCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle

The use of new SharkCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ProCore needle

This is the standard needle used currently to procure tissue from lesions under endoscopic ultrasound guidance

Intervention Type DEVICE

SharkCore needle

This is the new FDA approved needle for tissue procurement under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥ 18 years of age referred for EUS

Lesions requiring histologic diagnosis:

* Mesenchymal tumors
* Autoimmune pancreatitis
* Granulomatous disease
* Indeterminate hepatitis
* Confirmatory immunochemistry to establish a diagnosis (i.e. pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor)
* Lymphoma
* Solid tumors
* Previously non-diagnostic FNA

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5)
* Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet \< 50,000)
* Uncooperative patients
* Pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing, which is routine for all endoscopic procedures)
* Refusal to consent form
* Cystic lesions
* Inaccessible lesions to EUS (proximal to sigmoid colon or distal to second duodenum)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mouen Khashab

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mouen Khashab, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00095614

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.