Comparison Between Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G in EUS-guided FNB of Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT ID: NCT02909530
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore this study will enroll 40 patients in five German centers with solid pancreatic masses and consecutive indication for EUS-FNB. Both needles will be used in each patient following a predetermined random order.
Primary endpoint is the correct histological diagnosis of the mass assessed by each needle. Technical failure is regarded as a negative histological diagnosis.
Secondary endpoints include a comparison of technical failure using each needle, histological quality, duration of procedure and rate of adverse events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS
NCT01479803
EUS-FNB for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Side-fenestrated Vs Fork-tip Needle
NCT03622229
Study Comparing Pancreatic EUS-FNB With the 20-gauge Procore® and the 22-gauge Acquire® Needles
NCT03567863
EUS- and US- Guided Biopsy for Pancreatic Lesion
NCT07138976
Diagnostic Yield of 20-gauge Procore Needle for EUS-guided FNA Biopsy in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
NCT02920944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
First pass EZ Shot 3Plus then EZ Shot 2
Olympus EZ Shot 3Plus will be used to puncture the mass first (Intervention EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 3Plus first), then the 19G and EZ Shot 2 will be used to puncture the pancreatic mass.
EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 3Plus first
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
First pass EZ Shot 2 then EZ Shot 3Plus
Olympus EZ Shot 2 will be used to puncture the mass first (Intervention EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 2 19G first), then the EZ Shot 3Plus will be used to puncture the pancreatic mass.
EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 2 19G first
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 3Plus first
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
EUS-FNB with EZ Shot 2 19G first
Both needles (EZ Shot 3Plus 19G and EZ Shot 2 19G) will be used for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in each patient following a predetermined random order which needle is used to pass through the tumor first.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Haemorrhagic disease, disorder of hemostasis and coagulation (PT \<60%, PTT\> 42 sec. and platelets \<60000/µL)
* oral anticoagulants
* dual antiplatelet therapy with thienopyridines (e.g. clopidogrel)
* Pregnant or lactating
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ulm
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alexander Meining
Prof. Dr. Alexander Meining
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexander Meining
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Ulm
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg
Hamburg, , Germany
Niel Stensen Kliniken Marienhospital Osnabrück
Osnabrück, , Germany
Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital
Stuttgart, , Germany
University Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hann A, Epp S, Veits L, Rosien U, Siegel J, Moschler O, Bohle W, Meining A. Multicenter, randomized comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 19-gauge stainless steel and nitinol-based needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Apr;8(3):314-320. doi: 10.1177/2050640619887580. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
222/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.