Single Versus Dual Spine Attending Surgeons in Complex Adult Deformity Surgery:

NCT ID: NCT02703831

Last Updated: 2016-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2023-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two recent studies showed that having two attending spine surgeons performing complex adult spine deformity surgery instead of one, decreased complications, unplanned surgeries within 30-days \[Ames\], 90-day readmissions, wound infection, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis and post-operative neurologic complications \[Sethi\]. However, both studies were retrospective and did not evaluate any cost-savings associated with having two spine surgeons instead of one performing complex spine deformity surgery.

Most cost-effectiveness studies have used traditional accounting (TA) methods to determine costs. A few cost-effectiveness studies have used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) \[Kaplan\] in medicine \[Au, Balakrishnan\] and none in spine surgery.

Objectives: The objectives of the study are (1) to determine if dual spine attendings reduce downstream costs compared to a single spine attending for complex spine surgeries using traditional accounting methods; and (2) to demonstrate an application of the TDABC method to evaluate the operating room phase during complex adult spinal deformity surgery and compare it to traditional accounting methods (TA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two recent studies showed that having two attending spine surgeons performing complex adult spine deformity surgery instead of one, decreased complications, unplanned surgeries within 30-days \[Ames\], 90-day readmissions, wound infection, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis and post-operative neurologic complications \[Sethi\]. However, both studies were retrospective and did not evaluate any cost-savings associated with having two spine surgeons instead of one performing complex spine deformity surgery. With increasing scrutiny on the efficient use of health care dollars, it would be important to determine if there are any downstream cost savings to justify paying the surgeon fees of two spine attendings for these complex and high cost cases.

Most cost-effectiveness studies have used traditional accounting (TA) methods to determine costs. TA uses allocated expenses from the general ledger and payroll activity codes. These codes are derived from billable items and procedures entered into accounting software. Costs of services are grouped by cost types, across units of service.

A few cost-effectiveness studies have used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) \[Kaplan\] in medicine \[Au, Balakrishnan\] and none in spine surgery. TDABC allows for detailed identification of costs during all phases of a patient's care cycle. While TDABC has been used in other industries, its use has been described only a few times in health care and rarely in the operative setting \[Balakrishnan\]. This may be due to the large amount of manpower necessary to collect TDABC data.

Objectives: The objectives of the study are (1) to determine if dual spine attendings reduce downstream costs compared to a single spine attending for complex spine surgeries using traditional accounting methods; and (2) to demonstrate an application of the TDABC method to evaluate the operating room phase during complex adult spinal deformity surgery and compare it to traditional accounting methods (TA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scoliosis, Unspecified

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dual attending

Two attending spine surgeons during the critical portions of the surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dual attending

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two attending spine surgeons perform surgery

Single attending

One spine attending and an assistant during the critical portions of the surgery, The assistant can be a spine fellow, a resident or a physician's assistant.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Single Attending

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One spine attending and an assistant perform surgery. The assistant can be a spine fellow, a resident or a physician's assistant.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dual attending

Two attending spine surgeons perform surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Single Attending

One spine attending and an assistant perform surgery. The assistant can be a spine fellow, a resident or a physician's assistant.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients scheduled for a complex spine adult deformity surgery.

1. instrumented posterior fusion from the thoracic spine into the pelvis, S1 or iliac wings;
2. and/or any three-column posterior osteotomy, either a pedicle subtraction osteotomy or a vertebral column resection.
2. Is at least 25 years of age inclusive at time of surgery.
3. Is willing and able to comply with the study plan and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has presence of active malignancy.
2. Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic.
3. Is mentally incompetent.
4. Is a prisoner.
5. Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse.
6. Is pregnant or plan to be pregnant during the course of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norton Leatherman Spine Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven D Glassman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Norton Leatherman Spine Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Norton Leatherman Spine Center

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Leah Y Carreon, MD, MSc

Role: CONTACT

5025847525 ext. 4139

Kelly R Bratcher, RN

Role: CONTACT

5025847525

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-N0036

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LUMBAR & SACROILIAC FUSION STUDY
NCT07204288 RECRUITING NA
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial
NCT02076113 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA