Second Opinion in Spinal Surgery Indications: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT03082248
Last Updated: 2023-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
190 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-01
2019-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-surgery Physiotherapy for Patients With Specific Low Back Pain
NCT02454400
Impact of Muscle Degeneration in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04273828
Analysis of the Incidence of Post-Operative Wound Infections After Spine Surgery
NCT02891486
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02348645
Primary Sacroiliac Fusion Versus Fusion to the Sacrum for Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine
NCT04308018
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
190 patients with indication of surgical treatment will be enrolled for this clinical trial and will be advised to receive a second opinion at Hospital Israelite Albert Einstein (HIAE).
Both assessments (with orthopedic physicians) will be compared, and when consensus is reached about diagnostic hypotheses and treatment, patients will be referred for conservative or surgical treatment. Any disagreements will be resolved by a committee of spine surgeons (four orthopedists and four neurosurgeons with more than 15 years of experience).
When the treatment chosen for the first medical care (two consultations of the orthopedic surgeons) is the conservative treatment, patients will be referred to consultations in the rehabilitation center. When surgical treatment is indicated, the patient will be referred to one of the eight surgeons of the spinal committee.
All patients will have the freedom of choice to decide to participate in the study guided by the second opinion service or perform the recommended treatment in the first hospital in which they were treated.
Sample size: For the calculation of the sample size estimate, we considered data presented in the study by van der Roer et al. (2006), in which the mean score obtained by the EuroQol instrument in pre-treatment patients was 0.70 in chronic patients, with standard deviation of 0.19. Assuming that the correlation between the measurements obtained at the two main moments of comparison (baseline and after 10 weeks of treatment) is of the order of 0.5 and that the minimally relevant difference between the two moments is 0.07, we estimate that 90 patients should be considered in the conservative treatment group. Assuming that of the patients who use the second opinion service about 55% will perform surgical procedures in the service, we estimate that 100 patients should be included in this group. Sample size estimates were performed with the statistical package STATA version 10.0, considering 90% power and 5% level of significance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Physical Therapy Group
10-week supervised physiotherapeutic intervention; all patients will receive educational leaflets and folders for maintenance and adherence to the treatment program.
Physical Therapy
Patients allocated to the conservative treatment group will receive physical therapy according to the treatment-based classification approach and also educational leaflets and folders.
Spinal Surgery Group
Surgical procedures and techniques specific for the low back region, previously discussed and agreed upon among surgeons according to patients description.
Spinal Surgery
Patients allocated to the surgical procedure group will undergo spinal surgery procedures and techniques specific for the low back region.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical Therapy
Patients allocated to the conservative treatment group will receive physical therapy according to the treatment-based classification approach and also educational leaflets and folders.
Spinal Surgery
Patients allocated to the surgical procedure group will undergo spinal surgery procedures and techniques specific for the low back region.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. no contraindication to general anesthesia or any physiotherapeutic procedure;
3. able to understand Portuguese language and after acceptance of a written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
1. spinal fractures;
2. scoliosis greater than 20 degrees;
3. congenital deformities;
4. spinal tumors;
5. confirmed or suspected pregnancy;
6. history of previous surgery in the spine; and,
7. unable to participate in the follow-up (due to inability to read or complete the required forms).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mario Ferretti, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):656-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656.
Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.
Healy WL, Peterson RN. Department of Justice investigation of orthopaedic industry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1791-805. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00096. No abstract available.
Perret D, Rosen C. A physician-driven solution--the Association for Medical Ethics, the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, and ethical challenges in pain medicine. Pain Med. 2011 Sep;12(9):1361-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01217.x.
Viola DC, Lenza M, Almeida SL, Santos OF, Cendoroglo Neto M, Lottenberg CL, Ferretti M. Spine surgery cost reduction at a specialized treatment center. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jan-Mar;11(1):102-7. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000100018.
Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW. A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;75(6):470-85; discussion 485-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.6.470.
Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Childs JD. Subgrouping patients with low back pain: evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):290-302. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2498.
van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):578-82. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Low Back Pain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.