3rd-year Post-surgical Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration Onset in Lumbar Spine (Spinal Fusion vs. Lumbar Arthroplasty With Disc Replacement)
NCT ID: NCT05561322
Last Updated: 2024-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-27
2024-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Pre-existing Adjacent Segment Degeneration on Long-term Effectiveness After Lumbar Fusion Surgery
NCT04467944
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04469387
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease
NCT02385695
Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Anterior Cervical Surgery: Prospective Study of the Impact on the Adjacent Level
NCT00554528
Establishing a Descriptive Cohort of Patients Cared for Operation on the Spine
NCT02886260
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patient is then oriented towards the imaging department where he/she will have the benefit of and Magnetic Resonance Imaging and also a spinal X-ray(front and profile ; Roussouly classification).
The patient's participation in the study ends once the examination is over. The consultation in the orthopedic department and the imaging session will be planned in such a way that they can be performed all on the same day.
The study program provides for 12 months of inclusion and 4 months of data management, statistical analysis and writing up the report on the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spinal fusion patients
Patients who have undergone spinal fusion surgery and have had at least 3 years of follow-up.
Consultation involving pain evaluation, questionnaires and the Lasègue Manoeuver
Raising the lower limb with the knee in extension reproduces sciatica pain if there is an impression of discal pain with its origin at the roots of the sciatica nerve L5 and S1. This test is evaluated by the degree of elevation of the lower limb relative to the examination table. During the Lasègue manoeuvre the sciatica pain is improved during dorsal flexion of the foot.The doctor notes whether the Lasègue manoeuvre done on the healthy side exacerbates the pain on the opposite side. It is said that contralateral Lasègue sign is positive.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine
Sagittal proton density-weighted Dixon sequence on the lumbar spine and axial T2-weighted spin echo sequence on the lumbar discs.
Lumbar arthroplasty patients
Patients who have undergone lumbar arthroplasty with disc replacement and have had at least 3 years of follow-up.
Consultation involving pain evaluation, questionnaires and the Lasègue Manoeuver
Raising the lower limb with the knee in extension reproduces sciatica pain if there is an impression of discal pain with its origin at the roots of the sciatica nerve L5 and S1. This test is evaluated by the degree of elevation of the lower limb relative to the examination table. During the Lasègue manoeuvre the sciatica pain is improved during dorsal flexion of the foot.The doctor notes whether the Lasègue manoeuvre done on the healthy side exacerbates the pain on the opposite side. It is said that contralateral Lasègue sign is positive.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine
Sagittal proton density-weighted Dixon sequence on the lumbar spine and axial T2-weighted spin echo sequence on the lumbar discs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Consultation involving pain evaluation, questionnaires and the Lasègue Manoeuver
Raising the lower limb with the knee in extension reproduces sciatica pain if there is an impression of discal pain with its origin at the roots of the sciatica nerve L5 and S1. This test is evaluated by the degree of elevation of the lower limb relative to the examination table. During the Lasègue manoeuvre the sciatica pain is improved during dorsal flexion of the foot.The doctor notes whether the Lasègue manoeuvre done on the healthy side exacerbates the pain on the opposite side. It is said that contralateral Lasègue sign is positive.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine
Sagittal proton density-weighted Dixon sequence on the lumbar spine and axial T2-weighted spin echo sequence on the lumbar discs.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients covered by a health insurance scheme.
* All patients aged over 18.
* All patients operated with a lumbar spine disk prosthesis or vertebral arthrodesis with an anterior approach at the Orthopedic, Traumatology and Spine Surgery Department of Nimes University Hospital, France, at least 3 years previously.
* All patients who have undergone initial MRI before surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any patient under legal protection, guardianship or tutorship.
* Any patient who refuses to sign the consent form.
* Any patient for whom it is impossible to give clear information.
* Any patient with contra-indications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging such as an incompatible pacemaker, claustrophobia, metal apparatus or prosthetic hip.
* Any patient with a septic complication.
* Any patient with instrumentation or posterior arthrodesis.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nîmes University Hospital
Nîmes, Gard, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RCB no.
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NIMAO/2018-02/PK-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.