Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-01
2020-04-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal with this single center retrospective study is to identify the surgical approach that offers to the patient the better long term functional outcome. A phone call would allow us to ask patients a few questions:
* Mcnab's criteria
* Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
The patients medical file review would also allow us to identify:
* the length of hospital stay for the discectomy (in days)
* incidence of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
* incidence of redo surgeries
* incidence of adjacent level diseases
* incidence of dural tears and eventual complications (meningitis, orthostatic headaches,...)
* incidence of iliac vessels injuries and eventual complications (thrombosis, need for revascularisation,...)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Decompression Surgery
NCT04320043
Comparative Study of the Results of Anterior and Posterior Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Pathology
NCT04115202
3rd-year Post-surgical Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration Onset in Lumbar Spine (Spinal Fusion vs. Lumbar Arthroplasty With Disc Replacement)
NCT05561322
Neurologic Complications in Spinal Deformity Surgery
NCT01305343
Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) With Dynesys
NCT00791180
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When your back hurts, you may find it difficult to do some of the things you normally do.
This list contains sentences that people have used to describe themselves when they have back pain. When you read them, you may find that some stand out because they describe you today.
As you read the list, think of yourself today. When you read a sentence that describes you today, put a tick against it. If the sentence does not describe you, then leave the space blank and go on to the next one. Remember, only tick the sentence if you are sure it describes you today.
1. I stay at home most of the time because of my back.
2. I change position frequently to try and get my back comfortable.
3. I walk more slowly than usual because of my back.
4. Because of my back I am not doing any of the jobs that I usually do around the house.
5. Because of my back, I use a handrail to get upstairs.
6. Because of my back, I lie down to rest more often.
7. Because of my back, I have to hold on to something to get out of an easy chair.
8. Because of my back, I try to get other people to do things for me.
9. I get dressed more slowly then usual because of my back.
10. I only stand for short periods of time because of my back.
11. Because of my back, I try not to bend or kneel down.
12. I find it difficult to get out of a chair because of my back.
13. My back is painful almost all the time.
14. I find it difficult to turn over in bed because of my back.
15. My appetite is not very good because of my back pain.
16. I have trouble putting on my socks (or stockings) because of the pain in my back.
17. I only walk short distances because of my back.
18. I sleep less well because of my back.
19. Because of my back pain, I get dressed with help from someone else.
20. I sit down for most of the day because of my back.
21. I avoid heavy jobs around the house because of my back.
22. Because of my back pain, I am more irritable and bad tempered with people than usual.
23. Because of my back, I go upstairs more slowly than usual.
24. I stay in bed most of the time because of my back.
Note to users:
This questionnaire is taken from: Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8: 141-144
The score of the RDQ is the total number of items checked - i.e. from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24.
It is acceptable to add boxes to indicate where patients should tick each item.
The questionnaire may be adapted for use on-line or by telephone.
2\) Modified Macnab Criteria:
Excellent: No pain, No restriction of mobility, Return to normal work and level of activity
Good: Occasional nonradicular pain, Relief of presenting symptoms, Able to return to modified work
Fair: Some improved functional capacity, Still handicapped and/or unemployed
Poor: Continued objective symptoms of root involvement, Additional operative intervention needed at index level irrespective of length of postoperative follow-up
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anterior discectomy
The discectomy is made by an anterior muscle sparring approach (extraperitoneal).
Lumbar discectomy
Lumbar discectomy either by an anterior extraperitoneal approach or by a posterior midline approach.
Posterior discectomy
The discectomy is made by a posterior approach (posterior midline incision).
Lumbar discectomy
Lumbar discectomy either by an anterior extraperitoneal approach or by a posterior midline approach.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar discectomy
Lumbar discectomy either by an anterior extraperitoneal approach or by a posterior midline approach.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Acquired symptomatic spinal canal stenosis requiring decompression
* Previous lumbar surgeries
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
JM Remacle, MD, Head of Neurosurgery Department, CHR Citadelle
UNKNOWN
Vincent Bonhomme, MD, PhD, University Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHR Citadelle
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Remacle Thibault
MD, Resident in Neurosurgery Department, PhD Student University Of Liege, Belgium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHR Citadelle
Liège, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Thibault Remacle, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Th Remacle
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.