Time Efficiency of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Diversion With Robotic Staplers After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

NCT ID: NCT02665156

Last Updated: 2019-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives and Specific Aims Time efficiency of robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal stapled orthotopic neobladder remains a main drawback of this procedure. According to a recent consensus panel, the benchmark for intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder should be 5 hours in high volume centers .

This prospective single-stage phase 2 trial is designed to assess the time efficiency of using robotic stapler versus the conventional motorized staplers (Linear stapler articulated Endo GIA™, Covidien) in achieving the target outcome (total operative time \<5 hr).

Perioperative complications (intraoperative and 30-d postoperative complications according to the Clavien classification system), 30-d/90-d/ 180-d complication and readmission rates, early functional outcomes (time to recovery of urinary continence), 180-d and 360-d neobladder stone formation rates will be analyzed to assess the safety and the cost effectiveness of the procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary end point by which the sample size was determined was a total operative time \<5hr. In the last 50 cases of our series (data unpublished) this benchmark was obtained in 60% of patients (p0), while we expect to improve the time efficiency of the procedure with the use of robotic staplers maintaining the total operative time of the procedure \<5hrs in at least 80% (p1) of cases. According to A'Hern, in order to verify the significance of this hypothesis, the estimated sample size is 33 patients with a power of 80% at a significance level of 5%. The trial will be successful if the total operative time will be \<5hrs in at least 25 out of 33 patients.

The population of this study will include 35 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer without contraindications to orthotopic neobladder. The first two cases will be excluded in order to provide the entire surgical team the minimal skill necessary for a proper and time efficient use of the new surgical device (robotic stapler). The following 33 consecutive cases will be enrolled and the outcomes analyzed. The estimated time to complete the enrollment is 9 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cystectomy Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgical Staplers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic Stapled orthotopic neobladder

Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers: Partly stapled orthotopic neobladder: robotic staplers applied to create the neobladder neck and to suture the left side of the posterior aspect of neobladder. Right side of the posterior aspect of neobladder and the anterior aspect of the neobladder hand sewn.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robot assisted radical cystecomy. Separate packages extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to aortic bifurcation. Totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder with about 45 cm of ileum according to "Vescica Ileal Padovana".

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers

Robot assisted radical cystecomy. Separate packages extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to aortic bifurcation. Totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder with about 45 cm of ileum according to "Vescica Ileal Padovana".

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Pathologically confirmed muscle invasive bladder cancer or recurrent high grade urothelial carcinoma (BCG failures)

Exclusion Criteria

* All absoulte contraindications to orthotopic neobladder;
* Anesthesiologic contraindications to penumoeperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
* cT4 disease;
* clinical evidence of metastases (cM1) outside the pelvis.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Intuitive Surgical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Regina Elena Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giuseppe SImone

Ph.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Simone, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1034/15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.