Time Efficiency of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Diversion With Robotic Staplers After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy
NCT ID: NCT02665156
Last Updated: 2019-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective single-stage phase 2 trial is designed to assess the time efficiency of using robotic stapler versus the conventional motorized staplers (Linear stapler articulated Endo GIA™, Covidien) in achieving the target outcome (total operative time \<5 hr).
Perioperative complications (intraoperative and 30-d postoperative complications according to the Clavien classification system), 30-d/90-d/ 180-d complication and readmission rates, early functional outcomes (time to recovery of urinary continence), 180-d and 360-d neobladder stone formation rates will be analyzed to assess the safety and the cost effectiveness of the procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Open Versus Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.
NCT03434132
Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Open Radical Cystectomy
NCT01076387
Study Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy With Robot-assisted Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer
NCT03977831
Robotic Radical Cystectomy Outcomes
NCT04900558
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Urinary Diversion After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02108431
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The population of this study will include 35 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer without contraindications to orthotopic neobladder. The first two cases will be excluded in order to provide the entire surgical team the minimal skill necessary for a proper and time efficient use of the new surgical device (robotic stapler). The following 33 consecutive cases will be enrolled and the outcomes analyzed. The estimated time to complete the enrollment is 9 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic Stapled orthotopic neobladder
Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers: Partly stapled orthotopic neobladder: robotic staplers applied to create the neobladder neck and to suture the left side of the posterior aspect of neobladder. Right side of the posterior aspect of neobladder and the anterior aspect of the neobladder hand sewn.
Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers
Robot assisted radical cystecomy. Separate packages extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to aortic bifurcation. Totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder with about 45 cm of ileum according to "Vescica Ileal Padovana".
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers
Robot assisted radical cystecomy. Separate packages extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to aortic bifurcation. Totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder with about 45 cm of ileum according to "Vescica Ileal Padovana".
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Anesthesiologic contraindications to penumoeperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
* cT4 disease;
* clinical evidence of metastases (cM1) outside the pelvis.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Intuitive Surgical
INDUSTRY
Regina Elena Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Giuseppe SImone
Ph.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Simone, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
"Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute
Rome, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1034/15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.