Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Open Radical Cystectomy

NCT ID: NCT01076387

Last Updated: 2020-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2020-03-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if using robotic surgical technology during bladder cancer surgery helps to reduce complications during and after the surgery. The removal of the bladder and lymph nodes will be done by a robotic or by an open technique. It may be a Robotic-assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Or it may be an Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

open radical cystectomy

This is a prospective, randomized study designed to compare two techniques of radical cystectomy with PLND (open and robotic) for bladder cancer.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

open radical cystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and open urinary diversion.

robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

This is a prospective, randomized study designed to compare two techniques of radical cystectomy with PLND (open and robotic) for bladder cancer.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and open urinary diversion. Robotic radical cystectomy is routinely performed by robotically trained and experienced minimally invasive surgeons.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

open radical cystectomy

Open radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and open urinary diversion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

Robotic radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and open urinary diversion. Robotic radical cystectomy is routinely performed by robotically trained and experienced minimally invasive surgeons.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years.
* Scheduled for radical cystectomy at MSKCC

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy;
* Prior extensive open abdominal surgery, defined by the discretion of the attending surgeon
* Any clinical contraindication for Trendelenburg positioning
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Laudone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, Silberstein J, Keren Paz GE, Donat SM, Coleman JA, Mathew S, Vickers A, Schnorr GC, Feuerstein MA, Rapkin B, Parra RO, Herr HW, Laudone VP. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25496767 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/44.cfm

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Better in Better Out Cystectomy.
NCT06694649 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Off Clamp Randomization
NCT01732120 COMPLETED NA