Feasibility and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT03544437
Last Updated: 2018-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-05-21
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract
NCT03474926
Predictive Factorsfor Final Pathologic Ureteral Sections
NCT03677544
Prospective Study Comparing Extended With Limited Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01812902
Lateral Prostate Capsule Sparing Versus Nerve Sparing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy-orthotopic Ileal Neobladder for Bladder Cancer in the Male
NCT04966949
Nerve Sparing Versus Non Nerve Sparing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy-orthotopic Ileal Neobladder for Bladder Cancer in the Male
NCT05018429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in bladder carcinoma provides staging and, in selected patients, a survival benefit. Recent studies showed the therapeutic benefit of RPLND in advanced stage urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, but there is still a lack of prospective studies. Thus, the current guideline recommends lymph node dissection for invasive UCUT on the basis of insufficient evidence. But no prospective studies have standardized the ideal extent of RPLND or the optimum number of total lymph nodes that should be removed in patients with UUT-UC. Also more and more interest has been paid to establish standardized node dissection templates.
Also laparoscopic extended RPLND is still a technical challenge in urology, considering the high rate of severe complications and difficulties in manipulation. In Renji Hospital, laparoscopic extended RPLND at time of nephroureterectomy was performed via an extraperitoneal approach, avoiding interference with abdominal organs and achieving better exposure.
The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing an extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended RPLND at the time of RNU for UTUC in a prospectively collected cohort of patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
All patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic RNU with bladder cuff excision with concomitant extended RPLND performed by one of two urology surgeons at Renji Hospital.
The anatomical boundaries of the lymph node dissection were defined by the ipsilateral side of UUT-UC. In patients with right-sided UUT-UC, the template of dissection consisted of (i) right perihilar lymph nodes, (ii) paracaval lymph nodes, (iii) interaortocaval lymph nodes and (iv) right pelvic lymph nodes (common, external and obturator lymph nodes).
In patients with left-sided UUT-UC, the template of dissection included (i) left perihilar lymph nodes, (ii) para-aortic lymph nodes, and (iii) left pelvic lymph nodes (common, external and obturator lymph nodes ). Lymph node specimens were sampled "en bloc" with surrounding adipose tissue, and were sent to pathological examination as individual packets with the surrounding adipose tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have no distant metastasis
* have an ECOG 0 to 2
* expected to receive radical nephroureterectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* contra-indications to laparoscopic surgery (e.g. severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
* patients with cT4 disease before surgery
15 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
RenJi Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Xue, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jiwei Huang, M.D
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huang J, Qian H, Yuan Y, Cai X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Kong W, Wu X, Cao M, Huang Y, Chen H, Xue W. Prospective Clinical Trial of the Oncologic Outcomes and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 24;12:791140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791140. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UTUC-LND collaboration 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.