Prospective Study Comparing Extended With Limited Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

NCT ID: NCT01812902

Last Updated: 2018-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2018-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prostate cancer is currently the second most common cause of cancer death in men in Western countries. Lymphadenectomy is the gold standard procedure for staging pelvic lymph node and is classically indicated in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients and is held at the same time of prostatectomy. A traditionally pelvic lymphadenectomy covers the obturator chain bilaterally. Recently, some studies have demonstrated the existence of lymph node involvement outside the traditional boundaries of classical lymphadenectomy, recommending therefore extended dissection; this also includes the external / internal / common iliac chains and presacral. Thus lymphadenectomy, according to these authors, would also has a therapeutic role, besides helping in better staging. Although some retrospective studies report an association between lymphadenectomy and tumor progression, the exact impact of extended lymphadenectomy in oncological outcome of patients with prostate cancer is not clearly established, mainly by lack of prospective randomized studies on the subject . The study objectives are to compare the oncologic results of extended lymphadenectomy versus limited in order to elucidate the role of extended dissection in lymph node staging and results of treatment in terms of increased tumor cure. The investigators also intend to identify patients who may benefit from oncologically extended procedure. To do this, the investigators will evaluate prospectively patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at intermediate or high risk indicating lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy. These patients will be randomized to the extended versus limited lymphadenectomy and the investigators will compare the lymph node metastasis and pattern of spread of prostate cancer, as well as biochemical relapse-free survival, freedom from progression to metastasis and cancer-specific survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Extended LND

Radical Prostatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radical Prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Limited LND

Radical Prostatectomy with Limited lymphadenectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radical Prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radical Prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prostate Cancer patients with intermediate or high risk and with indication of radical prostatectomy and LND
* Absence of bone metastasis or other organ imaging test (MRI or scintigraphy)
* Absence of hormone treatment
* Absence of radiotherapy
* Signing an informed consent
* Availability and adequacy of lymph node tissue samples to perform the immunohistochemical

Exclusion Criteria

* Life expectancy less than 10 years
* Absence of clinical conditions for the procedure
* Laparoscopic or perineal surgery
* Presence of bone or visceral metastasis
* Neoadjuvant treatment
* Another malignant neoplasia
* Prior abdominal or pelvic surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marcos Francisco Dall'Oglio

M.D. Phd

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcos F Dall'Oglio, M.D. Phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sao Paulo

Jean FP Lestingi, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Jose P Junior, M.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Alexandre C Sant'Anna, M.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Rafael F Coelho, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Giuliano B Guglielmetti, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Juliana N Ravaninni, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Daher C Chade, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Matheus S Chaib, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Mauricio D Cordeiro, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Rodrigo R Pessoa, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Luiz AA Botelho, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Adriano Nesralla, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Claudio B Murta, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Fabio L Ortega, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Daniel K Abe, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Leonardo L Borges, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Luiz CN Oliveira, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Flavio GM Areas, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UROUSP - 006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.