Application of the "Off-Clamp And Sutureless" Technique in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

NCT ID: NCT07141225

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The detection rate of renal masses smaller than 7 cm has significantly increased in recent years. To preserve postoperative renal function to the greatest extent possible, guidelines from the European Association of Urology (EAU), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and others have endorsed partial nephrectomy (PN) as the preferred treatment strategy for small renal masses.

In conventional PN, it is necessary to clamp the renal artery or its branch arteries and employ a double-layer suturing technique to close the resection bed. This controls bleeding, maintains a clear surgical field, and prevents postoperative urinary leakage. The maximum safe duration of warm ischemia to avoid irreversible renal parenchymal damage remains controversial, though most studies indicate a window of 20-30 minutes. Consequently, the "off-clamp sutureless" concept has gained prominence. Its core principle is to avoid renal artery clamping and replace suturing with novel haemostatic techniques, thereby maximizing the preservation of healthy renal parenchyma. With the diversification of haemostatic material options and the widespread adoption of robotic-assisted systems, the off-clamp sutureless strategy has become technically feasible for small renal masses with low complexity .

Multiple retrospective studies demonstrate that the off-clamp sutureless technique is non-inferior, offering safety and surgical outcomes comparable to conventional robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). However, it is important to note that current research predominantly focuses on tumors ≤4 cm, is largely retrospective, and suffers from limited sample sizes. More robust, evidence-based medical evidence is required to support its application for larger tumors or those with complex anatomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The detection rate of renal masses smaller than 7 cm has increased significantly in recent years. To maximize the preservation of postoperative renal function, guidelines from the European Association of Urology (EAU), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and others have established partial nephrectomy (PN) as the preferred treatment option for small renal masses.

In conventional PN, the renal artery or its segmental branches must be clamped, and the renal defect is typically closed using a multilayer suturing technique to control bleeding, maintain a clear surgical field, and prevent postoperative urinary leakage. The maximum safe duration of warm ischemia time (WIT) remains controversial, though most studies suggest a limit of 20-30 minutes to avoid irreversible renal parenchymal damage. In murine models, renal damage increases steeply after ischemia exceeds 30 minutes. Furthermore, the renorrhaphy suture technique has a steep learning curve, and the suturing process itself can cause additional injury to the renal vasculature, potentially compromising global renal function . Notably, up to 30% of patients with normal preoperative renal function may experience a decline in their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to \<60 mL/min/1.73 m² post-surgery, and nearly 10% may suffer a \>50% reduction in renal function . Consequently, the concept of a "zero-ischemia sutureless" approach has gained traction. Its core principle is to avoid renal artery clamping and replace suturing with novel haemostatic methods, thereby maximizing the preservation of healthy renal parenchyma. With the expanding array of haemostatic agents and the widespread adoption of robotic-assisted systems, the zero-ischemia sutureless strategy has become technically feasible for small renal masses with low complexity.

Findings from multiple retrospective studies indicate that the zero-ischemia sutureless technique is non-inferior, demonstrating comparable safety and surgical outcomes to standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). A study by Antonio Franco et al. reported a median decline in overall renal function of only 10 mL/min after zero-ischemia sutureless surgery, supporting its role as a safe procedure that effectively preserves postoperative renal function and reduces complications. In a review, J. C. Moreno Cortés highlighted that replacing traditional artery clamping and suturing with mono- or bipolar electrocautery and new haemostatic agents offers a simpler and faster method for reconstruction. This approach simplifies the surgical steps without increasing the risk of complications. However, it is important to note that current research is predominantly focused on tumours ≤4 cm, is largely retrospective, and often involves small sample sizes. More robust evidence from prospective studies is needed to support the application of this technique for larger or anatomically complex tumours.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal and Urinary Disorders Renal Cancer Renal Particial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Off-Clamp Sutureless Group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Off-Clamp Sutureless Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

During the procedure, the renal artery and its branches are not clamped. The tumor is completely resected with a gross margin of 0.5-1 cm from its edge. Monopolar or bipolar electrocautery is used for hemostasis during resection. Following tumor removal, the renal resection bed is subjected to meticulous hemostasis, followed by the application of hemostatic agents without suture closure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Off-Clamp Sutureless Technique

During the procedure, the renal artery and its branches are not clamped. The tumor is completely resected with a gross margin of 0.5-1 cm from its edge. Monopolar or bipolar electrocautery is used for hemostasis during resection. Following tumor removal, the renal resection bed is subjected to meticulous hemostasis, followed by the application of hemostatic agents without suture closure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 80 years old, regardless of gender;
2. Radiological findings demonstrating a tumor size of ≤7 cm;
3. Imaging studies showing no evidence of collecting system invasion;
4. Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Preoperative imaging demonstrating evidence of distant metastasis or lymph node involvement;
2. Unilateral or bilateral multiple lesions not amenable to simultaneous resection;
3. History of prior systemic therapy, including molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or chemotherapy;
4. Intraoperative conversion to radical nephrectomy;
5. Intraoperative conversion to open surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shao Pengfei

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shao Pengfei

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pengfei Shao, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital), Nanjing, Jiangsu 210036

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital)

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pengfei Shao, Professor

Role: CONTACT

+8613851925825

Haoqi Miao, Postgraduate

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Pengfei Shao, Professor

Role: primary

13851925825

Haoqi Miao, Postgraduate

Role: backup

+86 13276636957

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-SR-568

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Off Clamp Randomization
NCT01732120 COMPLETED NA