Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT ID: NCT02513693
Last Updated: 2015-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impacts of Surgical Visibility Through Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on Intraocular Pressure in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02109133
Fine Tuning of Neuro-muscular Blockade in Robot-assisted Prostatectomy
NCT04638907
Recovery From dNMB Using Different Sugammadex Doses in Elderly Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Prostatectomy
NCT04854993
Haemodynamic Changes During Robotic Prostatectomy
NCT04235387
Effect of Deep BLock on Intraoperative Surgical Conditions
NCT01631149
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In laparoscopic procedures, introduction of capnoperitoneum for good visibility in surgical field is necessary. From anesthetic point of view this requirement can be met by adequate muscle relaxation. After withdrawal of capnoperitoneum at the end of the surgery the procedure is usually terminated quickly (this phase consists only from suture of a peritoneum and the small incisions through which instruments were inserted). Spontaneous recovery from NMB or usual reversal of the block by neostigmine are not fast and reliable enough at this moment. During standard neuromuscular blockade the dosage of NMBA is a compromise between optimal surgical conditions (sufficiently deep block) and capability to antagonize the block rapidly at the end of the surgery. Introduction of sugammadex into clinical praxis brings the potential to change this paradigm. With rocuronium, it is possible to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade safely until the very end of the surgery and unlike with spontaneous recovery or reversal of the block with neostigmine, administration of sugammadex at the end of the surgery will enable quick and consistent reversal of the block. Data about routine use of the deep block are rare, PubMed lists with search strategy \[(deep neuromuscular blockade) AND (laparoscopic surgery OR laparoscopy)\] 11 references (January 12, 2015, www.pubmed.com).
Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy will be randomized to two groups differing in muscle relaxation strategy (standard vs. deep) and the type of antagonizing drug at the end of the surgery (neostigmine vs. sugammadex). Relevant end-points and the differences between groups with deep and standard neuromuscular blockade will be compared. Indication and dosage of rocuronium, neostigmine and sugammadex correspond to manufacturers' recommendations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Neuromuscular Blockade
Drug: rocuronium + neostigmine
Administration of rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg iv, top-ups 5-10 mg iv to target value of Train-of-Four (TOF) count = 1-2, TOF-count measurement every 1 min. Neuromuscular blockade reversal at the end of anesthesia: neostigmine 0.03 mg/kg iv + atropine 0.5-1.0 mg iv Induction of anesthesia: midazolam 1-2 mg iv, sufentanil 10-30 mcg iv, propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg iv Anesthesia: sevoflurane in air to target 1.2-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC). Rescue medication: sevoflurane, propofol 20-40 mg iv Extubation when patient is conscious and attained the recovery from neuromuscular blockade to a TOF-ratio of at least 0,9.
Standard neuromuscular blockade
Standard neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to TOF-count 1-2. Reversal of the block with neostigmine.
Deep Neuromuscular Blockade
Drug: rocuronium + sugammadex
Administration of rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg iv, top-ups 5-10 mg iv to target value of Post-tetanic Count (PTC) = 1-2; PTC measurement every 4 min. Neuromuscular blockade reversal at the end of anesthesia: sugammadex 2 mg/kg iv (when PTC is 18-20 and TOF-count 0) or sugammadex 4 mg/kg iv (when PTC under 18).
Induction of anesthesia: midazolam 1-2 mg iv, sufentanil 10-30 mcg iv, propofol 1,5-2,5 mg/kg iv Anesthesia: sevoflurane in air to target 1.2-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC). Rescue medication: sevoflurane, propofol 20-40 mg iv.
Extubation when patient is conscious and attained recovery from neuromuscular blockade to a TOF-ratio of at least 0,9.
Deep neuromuscular blockade
Deep neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to PTC 1-2. Reversal of the block with sugammadex.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard neuromuscular blockade
Standard neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to TOF-count 1-2. Reversal of the block with neostigmine.
Deep neuromuscular blockade
Deep neuromuscular block provided by rocuronium to PTC 1-2. Reversal of the block with sugammadex.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent
* Elective robotic radical prostatectomy
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1-3
Exclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status over 3
* Indication for rapid sequence induction, signs of difficult airway severe neuromuscular, liver or renal disease
* Known allergy to drugs used in the study
* Malignant hyperthermia (medical history)
19 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Olomouc
OTHER
Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem
OTHER
Palacky University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Milan Adamus, MD, PhD, MBA
Milan Adamus, MD, PhD, MBA
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Milan Adamus, MD,PhD,MBA
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Palacky University Olomouc Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
Vladimir Cerny, MD,PhD,FCCM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc
Olomouc, , Czechia
Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J. E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital
Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lindekaer AL, Halvor Springborg H, Istre O. Deep neuromuscular blockade leads to a larger intraabdominal volume during laparoscopy. J Vis Exp. 2013 Jun 25;(76):50045. doi: 10.3791/50045.
Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Gatke MR. Optimized surgical space during low-pressure laparoscopy with deep neuromuscular blockade. Dan Med J. 2013 Feb;60(2):A4579.
Boon M, Martini CH, Aarts LP, Bevers RF, Dahan A. Effect of variations in depth of neuromuscular blockade on rating of surgical conditions by surgeon and anesthesiologist in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostatic surgery (BLISS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Mar 1;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-63.
Ding L, Zhang H, Mi W, Sun L, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H. [Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning on cerebral blood backflow during robotic radical prostatectomy]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015 May;35(5):712-5. Chinese.
Ding L, Zhang H, Mi W, He Y, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H. [Effects of dexmedetomidine on recovery period of anesthesia and postoperative cognitive function after robot-assisted laparoscopicradical prostatectomy in the elderly people]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb;40(2):129-35. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.02.003. Chinese.
Dogra PN, Saini AK, Singh P, Bora G, Nayak B. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience. Urol Ann. 2014 Apr;6(2):130-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.130555.
Kopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):51-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000471.
Donati F, Brull SJ. More muscle relaxation does not necessarily mean better surgeons or "the problem of muscle relaxation in surgery". Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1019-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000429. No abstract available.
Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1084-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000316.
Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Aug;31(8):430-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000094.
Vijayaraghavan N, Sistla SC, Kundra P, Ananthanarayan PH, Karthikeyan VS, Ali SM, Sasi SP, Vikram K. Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Apr;24(2):127-33. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182937980.
Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 18;2014(3):CD006930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3.
Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):892-905. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IGA_LF_2015_012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.