Effects of Blastocyst Stage Compared With Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer in Women Below 39 Years
NCT ID: NCT02639000
Last Updated: 2016-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
388 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Clinical Outcomes Following Transfer of Blastocysts Cultured From Thawed Cleavage Stage Embryos
NCT02681029
Synchronizing Blastocyst in Frozen Embryo Transfer
NCT03128970
Cumulative Live Birth Rates After Cleavage-stage Versus Blastocyst-stage Embryo Transfer
NCT03152643
Immediate Versus Postponed Single Blastocyst Transfer in Programmed or Stimulated Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer
NCT06304792
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Fresh Cycle With Single Blastocyst Stage and Double Cleavage-stage Embryos: a Single-center, Non-blind, Randomized Controlled Study
NCT05632731
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The rational of blastocyst stage transfer is that blastocyst stage is the most biologically correct stage for embryos to be in the uterus, and longer culture in the laboratory may give the possibility to reduce the number of genetically abnormal embryos.
The investigators design a single center randomized trial, including 388 women aged less than 39 years, performing in vitro fertilization, to confront blastocyst stage embryo transfers (ETs) and cleavage stage ETs. Each patient is randomized with a non blind randomization, based on a computer model, on the first day after fertilization.
The primary outcomes are implantation and pregnancy rate. The secondary outcome is to verify if blastocyst embryo transfer leads to a higher multiple-pregnancy rate.
An interim analysis takes place at one third of the population. Follow up is of 4 weeks for implantation rate, and covers 8 weeks regarding pregnancy rate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Blastocyst
Embryo transfer of at maximum 2 embryos at blastocyst stage
Embryo transfer
Embryo transfer of maximum of 2 embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage
Cleavage
Embryo transfer of at maximum 2 embryos at cleavage stage
Embryo transfer
Embryo transfer of maximum of 2 embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Embryo transfer
Embryo transfer of maximum of 2 embryos at cleavage or blastocyst stage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age less than 39 years
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
38 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Humanitas Research Hospital Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine Humanitas Fertility Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
Rozzano (Milan), , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4.
Levi-Setti PE, Cirillo F, Smeraldi A, Morenghi E, Mulazzani GEG, Albani E. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Mar;35(3):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1092-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
736
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.