Pregnancy Rate in Direct Versus Afterload Technique of Embryo Transfer
NCT ID: NCT05364528
Last Updated: 2022-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
8127 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary end points include the evaluation of the difficult transfer rates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study to Assess the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate for Poor Responders Women Undergoing Different Embryo Transfer Protocols
NCT05014867
The Effect of Embryo Transfer Technique on Pregnancy Outcomes in HRT-FET Cycles
NCT05564312
Embryotransfer Operator and Pregnancy Rate
NCT03561129
Does Transfer of Poor-quality Embryos With Good-quality Embryos Improve Pregnancy Outcome in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI?
NCT03113097
Retrospective Comparison of Pregnancy Outcome of Infertile Patients After Fresh and Warmed Single Blastocyst Transfer From 2014 to 2018.
NCT04310761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Any blastocysts that underwent preimplantation genetic testing will be excluded from the analysis, as well as embryos derived from gamete donation or those imported from other centers.
Data are gathered using a specific internal web-based database, which allows to organize, store and readily retrieve information about patients and IVF cycle.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
clinical pregnancies with direct catheter
Clinical pregnancies occurred after fresh and frozen blastocyst transfers using direct technique.
No interventions assigned to this group
clinical pregnancies with afterload catheter
Clinical pregnancies occurred after fresh and frozen blastocyst transfers using afterload technique.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfer
Exclusion Criteria
* Embryos derived from gamete donation
* Embryos imported from other centers
18 Years
43 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cirillo F, Immediata V, Ronchetti C, Carletti T, Morenghi E, Albani E, Baggiani A, Levi-Setti PE. Steps forward in embryo transfer technique: a retrospective study comparing direct versus afterload catheters at different time frames. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Dec;40(12):2895-2902. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02957-y. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.