REal World Advanced Experience of BioResorbable ScaffolD by SMart Angioplasty Research Team (SMART REWARD)
NCT ID: NCT02601404
Last Updated: 2017-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-11-30
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is known to disappear 2 to 3 years after the implantation, which may result in the more favorable very long-term clinical outcomes compared with metallic stents. The initial clinical experiences of BRS in relatively simple lesion subsets were comparable to DESs.
BRS, however, is limited by the disadvantageous mechanical characteristics such as thick strut and the risk of fracture by overdilation. There is concern that BRS is less optimal for complex lesion subsets such as bifurcation lesions, calcified tortuous lesions, or diffuse long lesions. Real world registry is needed to test the feasibility and safety of BRS in these complex lesion subsets.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bioresorbable Sirolimus-eluting scaffold in de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions
NCT07022587
Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of In-Stent-Restenosis
NCT03529006
Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents for Diffuse Long Coronary Artery Disease
NCT02831205
DEB Versus 2nd Generation DES in Patients With In-Scaffold Restenosis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
NCT03074305
ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis
NCT02486068
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bioresorbable Scaffold
Patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease using Absorb™(Abbott Vascular)
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS)
The implantation procedure of an Absorb™ is similar to a metallic stent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS)
The implantation procedure of an Absorb™ is similar to a metallic stent.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a significant lesion in a de novo coronary artery: a percent diameter stenosis (DS) 50% with 1) a positive history of recurrent angina pectoris; (2) objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent); or (3) abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (eg, fractional flow reserve) or a percent DS ≥70% even in the absence of the above-mentioned ischemic signs or symptoms.
* Patients are scheduled for coronary intervention
* He/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Cardiogenic shock
* Expected survival less than 2 years
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of study treatment or interpretation of patient safety or study results
19 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
MD,PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiac and Vascular Center; Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee JM, Joh HS, Choi KH, Hong D, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Choi JH, Choi SH, Jeong JO, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Chae JK, Hur SH, Bae JW, Oh JH, Chun KJ, Kim HJ, Cho BR, Shin D, Lee SH, Hwang D, Lee HJ, Jang HJ, Kim HK, Ha SJ, Shin ES, Doh JH, Hahn JY, Gwon HC; SMART-REWARD Investigators. Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Feb 6;38(5):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e34.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-07-163
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.