Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer vs Durable-polymer in Diabetic Patients
NCT ID: NCT02854423
Last Updated: 2016-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1347 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-01-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with BP-BES or DP-EES implantation were included in a multicenter registry between January 2007 and May 2012. Long-term clinical outcomes between BP-BES and DP-EES will be compared using propensity score matching. The pre-specified primary endpoint is the occurrence of major cardiac adverse events (MACE) - a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints are the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as definite stent thrombosis (ST).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bioabsorbable Versus Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent (DES): a Meta-analysis
NCT01466634
Everolimus- Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents in All-Comers
NCT01472705
Single Long vs Two Short Overlapping Bioabsorbable Polymer DES
NCT01718106
Test Efficacy of Biodegradable and Permanent Limus-Eluting Stents
NCT01068106
Outcome of Second Generation Drug-eLuting Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01293773
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
biodegradable polymer
percutaneous coronary interventions
Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with Biodegradable polymer Biolimus Eluting Stent or durable polymer Everolimus Eluting Stent implantation
durable-polymer
percutaneous coronary interventions
Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with Biodegradable polymer Biolimus Eluting Stent or durable polymer Everolimus Eluting Stent implantation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
percutaneous coronary interventions
Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with Biodegradable polymer Biolimus Eluting Stent or durable polymer Everolimus Eluting Stent implantation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* diabetes mellitus
* percutaneous coronary interventions with biolimus eluting stent or everolimus eluting stent implantation
* signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus ticlopidine or clopidogrel)
* known allergy to stent drugs
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Roma La Sapienza
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gennaro Sardella
Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RUDI 2D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.