Effect of PEEP and Trendelenburg on Ultrasound Size of Internal Jugular and Subclavian Veins

NCT ID: NCT02569424

Last Updated: 2016-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is no recommendation for the management of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during setting of a central venous catheter (CVC) in a ventilated patient. Several non-randomized studies have investigated the cross-sectional area (AST) ultrasound minor axis for different pressure levels by evaluating a single vessel every time or by not displaying the right or left side in the evaluation. Another study showed that there could be unpredictable size differences between the 2 subclavian veins.

In ventilated patient, the PEEP, which is intrathoracic, will result in a decrease of venous return and thus possibly a superior vena cava dilation, located outside the pleura, depending on their capacitance. Different pressure levels showed an increase of AST with the increase of intra-thoracic pressure on certain veins, in a heterogeneous and not randomized manner.

The primary purpose of the study is to measure the effect of PEEP (0, 5, 10 or 15 cm H2O) and the patient's position (supine or Trendelenburg strict -15-20 °) on the cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is no recommendation for the management of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during setting of a central venous catheter (CVC) in a ventilated patient. Several non-randomized studies have investigated the cross-sectional area (AST) ultrasound minor axis for different pressure levels by evaluating a single vessel every time or by not displaying the right or left side in the evaluation. Another study showed that there could be unpredictable size differences between the 2 subclavian veins.

In ventilated patient, the PEEP, which is intrathoracic, will result in a decrease of venous return and thus possibly a superior vena cava dilation, located outside the pleura, depending on their capacitance. Different pressure levels showed an increase of AST with the increase of intra-thoracic pressure on certain veins, in a heterogeneous and not randomized manner.

The primary purpose of the study is to measure the effect of PEEP (0, 5, 10 or 15 cm H2O) and the patient's position (supine or Trendelenburg strict -15-20 °) on the cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilated Patient in Intensive Care Management of the Expiratory End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Body Position

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

PEEP level Trendelenburg position cross-sectional area of the jugular and subclavian veins central venous catheter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ventilated patients

Patient's position (Supine or Trendelenburg strict -20°)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient's position

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Supine or Trendelenburg strict -20°)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient's position

Supine or Trendelenburg strict -20°)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patient ventilated in intensive care is eligible.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patient with stable hemodynamic status and Mean Blood Pressure (\< 65 mmHg)
* Patient with registered social security number

Exclusion Criteria

* clinical sign for a central venous thrombosis (unilateral edema ...).during echography screening before inclusion
* presence of a central line for more than 48 hours.
* Anechoic patient (checked during echography screening)
* History of cervical spine surgery.
* IntraCranial HyperTension
* patient in shock with hemodynamic instability and not stabilized
* patient treated by noradrenaline \> 1 µg/kg/min
* patient or relative's refusal
* protected patients ≥ 18 years, minors, pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sébastien PERBET

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-A00606-43

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHU-0246

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id