Medicoeconomic Evaluation of Two Surgical Techniques for Lobectomy in the Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02502318

Last Updated: 2024-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

261 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-29

Study Completion Date

2021-10-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a national study that involves the participation of 600 lung cancer patients indicated that treatment is ablation of the pulmonary lobe. This technique is called lobectomy.

Lobectomy may be performed in two different ways:

* Thoracotomy, which is the first reference approach and that is to make a large incision in the chest to pass between the ribs and spread the order to ablate the lobe.
* By video-thoracoscopy, which is a new surgical approach consisting in practice several small incisions in the chest wall to allow the introduction of a camera and special instruments to ablate the lobe.

The mini-invasive nature of video-thoracoscopy has a positive impact on postoperative expectoration and ventilation. As a result, the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications including atelectasis, pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is reduced. These respiratory complications are responsible for prolonged stays in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and overall hospitalisation. It also has an impact on recovery and quality of life when patients return home. The reduction in the incidence of complications should counterbalance the additional cost of video-thoracoscopy.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these two techniques in relation to the quality of life and the costs they generate.

Patients who agree to participate in the study were assigned to one or other of these groups (technical thoracotomy or video-thoracoscopy technique) by lot.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Lobectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lobectomy or segmentectomy using video-thoracoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Video-thoracoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lobectomy or segmentectomy using thoracotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

thoracotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Video-thoracoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

thoracotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have given their consent
* Any patient with proven or suspected lung cancer treated by lobectomy or segmentectomy.
* Patients with a negative mediastinoscopy or negative " EBUS-EUS " following a PET scan showing uptake in mediastinal lymph nodes in the preoperative examination.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patient affiliated to a social security regimen
* Patients with a WHO performance status equal to 0 or 1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Adults under wardship
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Tumours in contact with the pulmonary artery or developing in the lobar bronchi after bronchial fibroscopy.
* Tumours in contact with the costal periosteum or invading the chest wall
* Tumours invading the mediastinal pleura or structures of the mediastinium (superior vena cava, trachea, the main-stem bronchi, aorta, oesophagus, vertebrae)
* Tumours invading the diaphragm
* Tumours invading the neurovascular structures of the apex (brachial plexus, subclavicular artery, subclavicular vein) causing Pancoast-Tobias syndrome
* Patients with histologically-proven contralateral or supraclavicular lymph node (N3) involvement whatever the harvesting method.
* Patients with a positive mediastinoscopy or positive "EBUS-EUS" following a "PET scan" with uptake in one or more mediastinal lymph nodes.
* Patients with metastasis (brain, bone, liver, adrenal glands, contralateral lung, pleura).
* Patients who have undergone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Patients included in a neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy protocol.
* Patients who have already undergone thoracotomy.
* Patients with decompensated heart failure or with a systolic ejection fraction below 30%.
* Patients with severe pulmonary artery hypertension.
* Patients with untreated valve disease.
* Patients with unstable angina despite appropriate treatment.
* Patients with untreated carotid stenosis greater than 70%.
* Patients with histologically proven cirrhosis with various decompensations or who have presented haemoptysis because of oesophageal varicose veins.
* Patients with severe neurological sequellae (hemiplegia, paraplegia, tetraplegia).
* Patients presenting severe psychiatric disorders (dementia, psychosis).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CH Victor Dupouy

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

CH Avignon

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Centre Jean Perrin - Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CHU Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

HCL - Louis Pradel

Lyon, , France

Site Status

APHM Hôpital Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

APHP Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rennes - Hôpital de Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rouen

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Soilly AL, Aho Glele LS, Bernard A, Abou Hanna H, Filaire M, Magdaleinat P, Marty-Ane C, Tronc F, Grima R, Baste JM, Thomas PA, Richard De Latour B, Pforr A, Pages PB. Medico-economic impact of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy in lung cancer: multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01). BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09962-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37723516 (View on PubMed)

Pages PB, Abou Hanna H, Bertaux AC, Serge Aho LS, Magdaleinat P, Baste JM, Filaire M, de Latour R, Assouad J, Tronc F, Jayle C, Mouroux J, Thomas PA, Falcoz PE, Marty-Ane CH, Bernard A. Medicoeconomic analysis of lobectomy using thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for lung cancer: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01). BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e012963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012963.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28619764 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BERNARD PRME 2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Segmentectomy vs Lobectomy
NCT06180239 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING