Medicoeconomic Evaluation of Two Surgical Techniques for Lobectomy in the Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02502318
Last Updated: 2024-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
261 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-29
2021-10-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Lobectomy may be performed in two different ways:
* Thoracotomy, which is the first reference approach and that is to make a large incision in the chest to pass between the ribs and spread the order to ablate the lobe.
* By video-thoracoscopy, which is a new surgical approach consisting in practice several small incisions in the chest wall to allow the introduction of a camera and special instruments to ablate the lobe.
The mini-invasive nature of video-thoracoscopy has a positive impact on postoperative expectoration and ventilation. As a result, the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications including atelectasis, pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is reduced. These respiratory complications are responsible for prolonged stays in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and overall hospitalisation. It also has an impact on recovery and quality of life when patients return home. The reduction in the incidence of complications should counterbalance the additional cost of video-thoracoscopy.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these two techniques in relation to the quality of life and the costs they generate.
Patients who agree to participate in the study were assigned to one or other of these groups (technical thoracotomy or video-thoracoscopy technique) by lot.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intraoperative Conversion During Video-assisted Thoracoscopy Resection for Lung Cancer Does Not Alter Survival
NCT04663191
Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤ 2cm
NCT04937283
Comparison of Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤ 2cm
NCT05838053
Comparison of Sublobar and Lobectomy in Small (2 Cm or Less 0.5<CTR<1) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06028412
Comparison of Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer ≤ 2 cm in the Middle Third of the Lung Field
NCT04944563
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lobectomy or segmentectomy using video-thoracoscopy
Video-thoracoscopy
Lobectomy or segmentectomy using thoracotomy
thoracotomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Video-thoracoscopy
thoracotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Any patient with proven or suspected lung cancer treated by lobectomy or segmentectomy.
* Patients with a negative mediastinoscopy or negative " EBUS-EUS " following a PET scan showing uptake in mediastinal lymph nodes in the preoperative examination.
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patient affiliated to a social security regimen
* Patients with a WHO performance status equal to 0 or 1.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Tumours in contact with the pulmonary artery or developing in the lobar bronchi after bronchial fibroscopy.
* Tumours in contact with the costal periosteum or invading the chest wall
* Tumours invading the mediastinal pleura or structures of the mediastinium (superior vena cava, trachea, the main-stem bronchi, aorta, oesophagus, vertebrae)
* Tumours invading the diaphragm
* Tumours invading the neurovascular structures of the apex (brachial plexus, subclavicular artery, subclavicular vein) causing Pancoast-Tobias syndrome
* Patients with histologically-proven contralateral or supraclavicular lymph node (N3) involvement whatever the harvesting method.
* Patients with a positive mediastinoscopy or positive "EBUS-EUS" following a "PET scan" with uptake in one or more mediastinal lymph nodes.
* Patients with metastasis (brain, bone, liver, adrenal glands, contralateral lung, pleura).
* Patients who have undergone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Patients included in a neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy protocol.
* Patients who have already undergone thoracotomy.
* Patients with decompensated heart failure or with a systolic ejection fraction below 30%.
* Patients with severe pulmonary artery hypertension.
* Patients with untreated valve disease.
* Patients with unstable angina despite appropriate treatment.
* Patients with untreated carotid stenosis greater than 70%.
* Patients with histologically proven cirrhosis with various decompensations or who have presented haemoptysis because of oesophageal varicose veins.
* Patients with severe neurological sequellae (hemiplegia, paraplegia, tetraplegia).
* Patients presenting severe psychiatric disorders (dementia, psychosis).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, , France
CH Avignon
Avignon, , France
Centre Jean Perrin - Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CHU Dijon
Dijon, , France
HCL - Louis Pradel
Lyon, , France
APHM Hôpital Nord
Marseille, , France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
APHP Hôpital Cochin
Paris, , France
CHU de Rennes - Hôpital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, , France
CHU de Rouen
Rouen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soilly AL, Aho Glele LS, Bernard A, Abou Hanna H, Filaire M, Magdaleinat P, Marty-Ane C, Tronc F, Grima R, Baste JM, Thomas PA, Richard De Latour B, Pforr A, Pages PB. Medico-economic impact of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy in lung cancer: multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01). BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1004. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09962-y.
Pages PB, Abou Hanna H, Bertaux AC, Serge Aho LS, Magdaleinat P, Baste JM, Filaire M, de Latour R, Assouad J, Tronc F, Jayle C, Mouroux J, Thomas PA, Falcoz PE, Marty-Ane CH, Bernard A. Medicoeconomic analysis of lobectomy using thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for lung cancer: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01). BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e012963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012963.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BERNARD PRME 2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.