Assessment of Ergonomics in 3D vs 2D Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
NCT ID: NCT03925103
Last Updated: 2020-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-01
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thanks to recent technological advances in high definition display systems, three dimensional VATS (3D) has been developed in an attempt of overcoming some optical limits of two dimensional (2D) VATS.
In this single center randomized trial our aim is to comparatively assess ergonomics of 3D versus 2D VATS lobectomy for early stage NSCLC.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VATS Versus Open Pulmonary Lobectomy in the Limelight of OEP
NCT02910453
Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer by VATS Versus OPEN Lobectomy
NCT01933828
Intraoperative Conversion During Video-assisted Thoracoscopy Resection for Lung Cancer Does Not Alter Survival
NCT04663191
Modified Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
NCT01337037
Single-port, Two-port Versus Three-port VATS on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02992353
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For over than three decades, several thoracic surgeons adopted VATS for anatomical lung resection using two-dimensional (2D) display systems. However, a 2D image lacks depth of perception which may negatively affect surgical manoeuvring.
Three dimensional (3D) display systems for VATS can offer superior magnified vision of the surgical field and better perception of depth during surgical manoeuvring potentially shortening learning curve, which may thus overcome some optical limitations of 2D systems.
In this single center randomized trial our aim is to comparatively assess ergonomics of 3D versus 2D VATS lobectomy for early stage (stage I-II) NSCLC. For this purpose we compared three ergonomical domains: exposure, instrumentation and maneuvering with the aid of a scoring scale entailing analysis of 5 main technical steps: vein, artery bronchus, lymph node and fissure score.
The evaluation process of the five surgical steps was carried out by 4 thoracic surgeons who individually scored all recorded operations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3D VATS lobectomy
Patients undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy by a three-dimensional display system
3D VATS lobectomy
pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 3 dimensional display system
2D VATS lobectomy
Patients undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy by a two-dimensional display system
2D VATS lobectomy
pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 2 dimensional display system
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3D VATS lobectomy
pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 3 dimensional display system
2D VATS lobectomy
pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 2 dimensional display system
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO)\>60%
* Both predicted postoperative (PPO) FEV1 and PPO DLCO \>35%
* American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score\<=2
* Body mass index (BMI) \>18 \<28
Exclusion Criteria
* History of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
* Radiologic evidence of extensive pleural adhesions.
* Age \<18 or \>80 years.
* Patients with previous pleurodesis or thoracotomy in the affected hemithorax.
* Patients who will undergo surgical lung resection other than lobectomy.
* Patients with severe comorbidity contraindicating lobectomy.
* Patients refusal or noncompliance to general surgery and one-lung ventilation.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rome Tor Vergata
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eugenio Pompeo
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eugenio Pompeo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tor Vergata University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Policlinico Tor Vergata University
Roma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, McKenna RW, Landrenau RJ, Jones DR, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;139(4):976-81; discussion 981-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.059. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, Petersen RP, Onaitis MW, Toloza E, Harpole DH, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug;138(2):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.026.
Xu Y, Chen N, Ma A, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu C, Liu L. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for thoracic disease: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;25(6):862-871. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx219.
Bagan P, De Dominicis F, Hernigou J, Dakhil B, Zaimi R, Pricopi C, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Berna P. Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems dagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):820-3. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv031. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Jiao P, Wu QJ, Sun YG, Ma C, Tian WX, Yu HB, Tong HF. Comparative study of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic two-port lobectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2017 Jan;8(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12387. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Dong S, Yang XN, Zhong WZ, Nie Q, Liao RQ, Lin JT, Wu YL. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional visualization in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2016 Sep;7(5):530-534. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12361. Epub 2016 May 23.
Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2553-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2733. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-1RT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.