Assessment of Ergonomics in 3D vs 2D Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

NCT ID: NCT03925103

Last Updated: 2020-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) pulmonary lobectomy is currently widely employed as the first treatment option for surgical management of early stage (stage I-II) non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC).

Thanks to recent technological advances in high definition display systems, three dimensional VATS (3D) has been developed in an attempt of overcoming some optical limits of two dimensional (2D) VATS.

In this single center randomized trial our aim is to comparatively assess ergonomics of 3D versus 2D VATS lobectomy for early stage NSCLC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is widely employed for pulmonary lobectomy in early stage non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC). Indeed, VATS is thought to represent an optimal minimally invasive surgical option which is deemed superior to conventional thoracotomy since it enables smaller incisions with no rib spreading thus minimizing both postoperative pain and hospital stay.

For over than three decades, several thoracic surgeons adopted VATS for anatomical lung resection using two-dimensional (2D) display systems. However, a 2D image lacks depth of perception which may negatively affect surgical manoeuvring.

Three dimensional (3D) display systems for VATS can offer superior magnified vision of the surgical field and better perception of depth during surgical manoeuvring potentially shortening learning curve, which may thus overcome some optical limitations of 2D systems.

In this single center randomized trial our aim is to comparatively assess ergonomics of 3D versus 2D VATS lobectomy for early stage (stage I-II) NSCLC. For this purpose we compared three ergonomical domains: exposure, instrumentation and maneuvering with the aid of a scoring scale entailing analysis of 5 main technical steps: vein, artery bronchus, lymph node and fissure score.

The evaluation process of the five surgical steps was carried out by 4 thoracic surgeons who individually scored all recorded operations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (Stage 1-2)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One to one parallel assignment to each treatment
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D VATS lobectomy

Patients undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy by a three-dimensional display system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D VATS lobectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 3 dimensional display system

2D VATS lobectomy

Patients undergo thoracoscopic lobectomy by a two-dimensional display system

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2D VATS lobectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 2 dimensional display system

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D VATS lobectomy

pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 3 dimensional display system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

2D VATS lobectomy

pulmonary lobectomy carried out by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with a 2 dimensional display system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical NSCLC early stage (stage I-II).
* Both forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO)\>60%
* Both predicted postoperative (PPO) FEV1 and PPO DLCO \>35%
* American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score\<=2
* Body mass index (BMI) \>18 \<28

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical NSCLC stage\> II
* History of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
* Radiologic evidence of extensive pleural adhesions.
* Age \<18 or \>80 years.
* Patients with previous pleurodesis or thoracotomy in the affected hemithorax.
* Patients who will undergo surgical lung resection other than lobectomy.
* Patients with severe comorbidity contraindicating lobectomy.
* Patients refusal or noncompliance to general surgery and one-lung ventilation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Rome Tor Vergata

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eugenio Pompeo

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eugenio Pompeo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tor Vergata University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico Tor Vergata University

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, McKenna RW, Landrenau RJ, Jones DR, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;139(4):976-81; discussion 981-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.059. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20172539 (View on PubMed)

Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, Petersen RP, Onaitis MW, Toloza E, Harpole DH, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Aug;138(2):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19619789 (View on PubMed)

Xu Y, Chen N, Ma A, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu C, Liu L. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for thoracic disease: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;25(6):862-871. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx219.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29049786 (View on PubMed)

Bagan P, De Dominicis F, Hernigou J, Dakhil B, Zaimi R, Pricopi C, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Berna P. Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems dagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):820-3. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv031. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25736286 (View on PubMed)

Jiao P, Wu QJ, Sun YG, Ma C, Tian WX, Yu HB, Tong HF. Comparative study of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic two-port lobectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2017 Jan;8(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12387. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27755803 (View on PubMed)

Dong S, Yang XN, Zhong WZ, Nie Q, Liao RQ, Lin JT, Wu YL. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional visualization in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2016 Sep;7(5):530-534. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12361. Epub 2016 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27766782 (View on PubMed)

Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2553-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2733. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19289625 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-1RT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Image Guided VATS vs. VATS Resection
NCT03623958 RECRUITING NA