Maximizing Lymph Node Dissection on Fresh and Fixed Lung Cancer Resection Specimens

NCT ID: NCT06252129

Last Updated: 2025-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-26

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lung cancer patients undergoing upfront surgery, highly benefit from a systematic lymph node dissection in the mediastinum and in the surgical specimens. The latter is performed by the pathologist. Developing a standardized technique to dissect the lobectomy specimen has the potential of maximizing the retrieval of all N1 stations lymph nodes. The investigators believe that the adoption of such technique will improve lung cancer staging and identify a higher number of patients that qualify for adjuvant therapies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anatomic lung resection with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the best type of resection may sometimes be debated, it is clear that mediastinal, hilar, and lobar lymph nodes (LNs) should be routinely retrieved to achieve a complete lung cancer resection. According to major international guidelines, at least 3 hilar/intrapulmonary stations and 3 mediastinal stations should be assessed during resection. Although there is still a debate over whether the ideal number of LN stations sampled or the total number of LNs removed per station provides a better analysis, radical systematic LN dissection seems to offer the best oncological outcomes. In fact, in patients with tumors ≤4 cm in diameter completely resected, the quality of the mediastinal lymph node dissection and the thoroughness of the examination of the surgical specimen will select candidates for adjuvant treatment and define oncologic prognosis. The consequences of an incorrect lymph node classification can be substantial: while patients with N0 NSCLC have approximately 75% 5-year overall survival (OS), patients with NSCLC classified as N1 have a 5-year OS of 49%, and patients with NSCLC classified as N2 a 5-year OS of 36%. Therefore, the burden of determining the correct prognosis lies on the surgeon to perform a rigorous and thorough oncological resection, and on the pathologist to fully assess enough intrapulmonary LNs. Inaccuracy by either specialist leads to pathologic understage and suboptimal clinical management, which will lead to poor patient outcomes.

Developing a standardized technique to dissect the lobectomy specimen has the potential of maximizing the retrieval of all N1 stations lymph nodes. The investigators believe that the adoption of such technique will improve lung cancer staging and identify a higher number of patients that qualify for adjuvant therapies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis Pathologic Processes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1. Interventional group

subjects who are being consented to this study and undergoing lymph node dissection as outlined in this protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

No interventions assigned to this group

Concurrent non-interventional group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Retrospective cohort from 2021-2020

Group Type OTHER

Control group

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Subjects undergoing a lung specimen lymph node dissection

A lobectomy specimen's resection will undergo systematic lymph node dissection either by the patient's treating thoracic surgeon and/or by a member of the pathology team.

The protocol for a standardized lymph node dissection consists of a series of blunt peribronchial dissections starting from the hilum to the periphery, with particular attention to points of airway bifurcation where intrapulmonary lymph nodes aggregate. By emphasizing the intrapulmonary lymph node map and a standardized dissection, the team will remove more lymph nodes from the lobectomy specimen, resulting in an accurate N staging.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

Control group

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subjects with a lung nodule or mass who are eligible to undergo a lobectomy.
2. Subject without any metastasis present.
3. Subjects who have peripheral lung nodule location
4. Subjects must be 18 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
2. Subjects who have a lung nodule located in a central location. Central tumors are defined by those infiltrating the lobar airway.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paula Antonia Ugalde Figueroa

Associate Surgeon, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Principal Investigator.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Womens Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Paula Ugalde Figueroa, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

(617) 732-7696

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Paula Ugalde Figueroa THORACIC SURGEON, MD

Role: primary

6177946491

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DFCI IRB protocol #23-576

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.