Lymphadenectomy in NSCLC With and Without Adjuvant Therapy
NCT ID: NCT04419935
Last Updated: 2020-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-13
2025-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
On the other hand, the actual categorization of patients based on the hilar or mediastinal involvement (N1 or N2) risks to be too ineffective and straightforward for prognosis prediction and an indication of adjuvant treatments. This issue was underlined in the 8th TNM proposal for the N sub-classification, with a final proposal of different subgroups based on the number of involved stations. However, the IASLC committee noted that this proposal presented some limits due overlapping or not statistical significance among some survival curves, so the proposal was not adopted in the staging system. Moreover, the committee stated that the lack of information regarding some data such as the number of the resected or the metastatic nodes might affect the results and limited other proposals.
The objectives of this study are:
* To evaluate the prognostic role of the kind of lymphadenectomy, the number of the resected and/or metastatic lymph nodes in surgically treated N positive patients in terms of survival.
* To evaluate the indication and the role of adjuvant treatments in these patients.
* To identify patients with increased risk of early recurrence or poor survival based on the lymph node involvement characteristics In particular, data will be collect in a prospective database including clinical and pathological data, kind of lymphadenectomy, number of resected nodes, number of metastatic nodes, kind and schedule of adjuvant therapy and follow-up status
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Segmentectomy vs Lobectomy
NCT06180239
Molecular Signature From Tumor to Lymph Nodes
NCT04677205
Maximizing Lymph Node Dissection on Fresh and Fixed Lung Cancer Resection Specimens
NCT06252129
Radical Resection With Contralateral Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical N3 NSCLC
NCT07003490
Lymph Node Removal in Treating Patients With Stage I or Stage II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003831
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lymphadenectomy
Lymphadenctomy according with ESTS guidelines
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \>18 years
* Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Histology
* Anatomical lung resection (segmentectomy, lobectomy or bilobectomy, pneumonectomy)
* Pre-operative CT and PET evaluation
* Preoperative and postoperative tumour board discussion
* Intraoperative lymph node assessment (minimum 3 mediastinal stations harvested)
* Lymph node metastases
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Psychiatric disease
* Wedge resection
* Distant metastases
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chiappetta marco
Medical Doctor - Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marco Chiappetta
Roma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.