Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Evaluation of Delivery by Vacuum Extraction

NCT ID: NCT02468427

Last Updated: 2022-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

137 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a prospective, randomized Trial, the investigators compare Hands-on teaching and frontal teaching using a Training Video for learning how to perform an assisted delivery by vacuum extraction on a pelvic Training model. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores are the primary outcome. The investigators hypothesize that Hands-on Training is superior to a video-teaching with regard to the OSATS scores achieved by the Trainees.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The optimal mode of Training surgical novices how to perform an assisted delivery by means of vacuum extraction is unknown. We prospectively randomize probands to a 30 min hands-on (group 1) and a 30 min demonstration (group 2) training session teaching a standardized vacuum Extraction (VE) algorithm scheme on a pelvic training model. Probands are tested with a 24 item Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scoring system after training and 48 hours, and 72 hours thereafter. OSATS scores are the primary outcome. Performance time (PT), self assessment (SA), confidence (CON), and global rating scale (GRS) are the secondary outcomes. Statistics will beperformed using Mann-Whitney U-test, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hands-on Teaching

Medical students receive a 30 minutes hands-on training session. All study probands perform assisted delivery (operative vaginal delivery) by vacuum extraction on a pelvic model immediately after the training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hands-on teaching

Intervention Type OTHER

Training session of 30 minutes duration with every proband performing a vacuum extraction on a pelvic training model.

Frontal teaching

Medical students receive a 30 minutes frontal teaching session using a training video demonstrating how to perform assisted delivery (operative vaginal delivery) by vacuum extraction on a pelvic model immediately after the training.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frontal teaching

Intervention Type OTHER

Training session of 30 minutes duration consisting of a video which demonstrates how to perform a vacuum extraction on a pelvic training model.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hands-on teaching

Training session of 30 minutes duration with every proband performing a vacuum extraction on a pelvic training model.

Intervention Type OTHER

Frontal teaching

Training session of 30 minutes duration consisting of a video which demonstrates how to perform a vacuum extraction on a pelvic training model.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medical Student
* no previous experience in assisted delivery
* no previous gynecologic surgery training

Exclusion Criteria

* language barrier
* unwillingness to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruhr University of Bochum

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Clemens Tempfer

Prof. Clemens Tempfer, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clemens B Tempfer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruhr University Bochum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. OBGYN Ruhr University Bochum

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hilal Z, Kumpernatz AK, Rezniczek GA, Cetin C, Tempfer-Bentz EK, Tempfer CB. A randomized comparison of video demonstration versus hands-on training of medical students for vacuum delivery using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(11):e6355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006355.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28296771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VACUUM-OSATS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PAC Time Assessment
NCT03451604 UNKNOWN