Oral Immunotherapy in Cow's Milk Allergy (CMA) in Children : "Petit Lait" Study

NCT ID: NCT02465905

Last Updated: 2017-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective study Main objective: to evaluate the efficiency and the security of two protocols of immunotherapy (raw milk versus heated milk) in a cohort of children with persistent Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated CMA (IgE-CMA).

Secondary objectives: to determinate if the enumeration of casein-specific IL-4- and IL-13-secreting T cells could be a valuable biomarker of successful immunotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study prospectively included children aged older than 3 years, with an IgE-CMA.

Children were part of the " Petit Lait " Study, led from June 2012 in the Allergology Department of Armand Trousseau Children's Hospital, "Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)", France

1. Inclusion criteria All the children presenting with a diagnosis of IgE- CMA(defined as a history of reaction to the ingestion of cow's milk product and positive skin prick test (wheal ≥3 mm to cow's milk with no reaction to the negative control and specific IgE to casein \>0.35 (kiloUnit) kU/l) and referred to one of the Allergology Department were offered to enter the study.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPCFC) oral food challenge The DBPCFC was performed outside of episodes of exacerbation of acute illness. Children were admitted to the allergy clinic on two separate days, and food challenges were performed under the supervision of an experienced allergist. A peripheral intravenous line was inserted in each patient before starting the challenge, according to recommendations.Increasing doses of cow's milk were administered 20 min apart. Two protocols were available, one called " standard protocol " and one called "hyperallergic protocol". Type of protocol was chosen before inclusion through a multidisciplinar and collegial manner. Challenge was stopped in case of a clinical reaction compatible with an allergic reaction. Antihistamine, methylprednisolone, bronchodilator or epinephrine was administered if necessary. Cumulative dose of cow's milk tolerated defined the reactive threshold in CMA children.
2. Exclusion criteria Children who have presented an anaphylactic reaction during the previously year, who reacted with placebo during the DBPCFC or those with lacking consent or parents having difficulties to understand the protocol were excluded from the study.
3. Oral Immunotherapy Phase Children were assigned by randomization to raw milk immunotherapy or heated milk immunotherapy.
4. Prospective follow-up A monthly call was performed by a medical staff trained to allergology and families were asked on milk dose daily ingested at home and on eventual adverse side effects. A final DBPCFC using the standard protocol was planned once the daily dose attained 80 mL of raw milk.
5. Biological markers

* Measurement of IgE and Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) against casein
* Measurement of Interleukin 4 (IL4) and Interleukin 13 (IL13) secreting lymphocyts by an Enzym Link ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay to cow's milk protein

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cow's Milk Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Raw milk

For raw milk immunotherapy (RMI), fixed dose of raw milk was daily administered at home, determined using tolerated threshold dose during the DBPCFC. Augmentation was made every 5 weeks in the allergy clinic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

raw milk

Intervention Type OTHER

Heated milk

For heated milk immunotherapy (HMI), families were asked to weekly increase the daily dose of milk at home using industrial preparations. Milk included in the preparation was less and less heated among time. Passage from heated-milk to half-heated milk and then raw milk was performed in the allergy clinic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Heated milk

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

raw milk

Intervention Type OTHER

Heated milk

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All the children presenting with a diagnosis of IgE- CMA(defined as a history of reaction to the ingestion of cow's milk product and positive skin prick test (wheal ≥3 mm to cow's milk with no reaction to the negative control and specific IgE to casein \>0.35 kU/l)

Exclusion Criteria

* Children who have presented an anaphylactic reaction during the previously year, who reacted with placebo during the DBPCFC or those with lacking consent or parents having difficulties to understand the protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr Flore AMAT

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Flore AMAT

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service d'Allergologie

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-A00641-42

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

An Interventional Study of Milk Allergy
NCT00578656 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1