Oral Immunotherapy in Cow's Milk Allergy (CMA) in Children : "Petit Lait" Study
NCT ID: NCT02465905
Last Updated: 2017-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary objectives: to determinate if the enumeration of casein-specific IL-4- and IL-13-secreting T cells could be a valuable biomarker of successful immunotherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Milk Desensitization in Children
NCT03644381
Oral Tolerance in Cow's Milk Allergy in the Infant
NCT00298376
Early Oral Immunotherapy in Infants With Cow's Milk Protein Allergy
NCT03586388
Sublingual Milk Immunotherapy in Children
NCT00874627
The Safety and Efficacy of Sublingual/Oral Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Milk Protein Allergy
NCT00732654
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Children were part of the " Petit Lait " Study, led from June 2012 in the Allergology Department of Armand Trousseau Children's Hospital, "Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)", France
1. Inclusion criteria All the children presenting with a diagnosis of IgE- CMA(defined as a history of reaction to the ingestion of cow's milk product and positive skin prick test (wheal ≥3 mm to cow's milk with no reaction to the negative control and specific IgE to casein \>0.35 (kiloUnit) kU/l) and referred to one of the Allergology Department were offered to enter the study.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPCFC) oral food challenge The DBPCFC was performed outside of episodes of exacerbation of acute illness. Children were admitted to the allergy clinic on two separate days, and food challenges were performed under the supervision of an experienced allergist. A peripheral intravenous line was inserted in each patient before starting the challenge, according to recommendations.Increasing doses of cow's milk were administered 20 min apart. Two protocols were available, one called " standard protocol " and one called "hyperallergic protocol". Type of protocol was chosen before inclusion through a multidisciplinar and collegial manner. Challenge was stopped in case of a clinical reaction compatible with an allergic reaction. Antihistamine, methylprednisolone, bronchodilator or epinephrine was administered if necessary. Cumulative dose of cow's milk tolerated defined the reactive threshold in CMA children.
2. Exclusion criteria Children who have presented an anaphylactic reaction during the previously year, who reacted with placebo during the DBPCFC or those with lacking consent or parents having difficulties to understand the protocol were excluded from the study.
3. Oral Immunotherapy Phase Children were assigned by randomization to raw milk immunotherapy or heated milk immunotherapy.
4. Prospective follow-up A monthly call was performed by a medical staff trained to allergology and families were asked on milk dose daily ingested at home and on eventual adverse side effects. A final DBPCFC using the standard protocol was planned once the daily dose attained 80 mL of raw milk.
5. Biological markers
* Measurement of IgE and Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) against casein
* Measurement of Interleukin 4 (IL4) and Interleukin 13 (IL13) secreting lymphocyts by an Enzym Link ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay to cow's milk protein
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Raw milk
For raw milk immunotherapy (RMI), fixed dose of raw milk was daily administered at home, determined using tolerated threshold dose during the DBPCFC. Augmentation was made every 5 weeks in the allergy clinic.
raw milk
Heated milk
For heated milk immunotherapy (HMI), families were asked to weekly increase the daily dose of milk at home using industrial preparations. Milk included in the preparation was less and less heated among time. Passage from heated-milk to half-heated milk and then raw milk was performed in the allergy clinic.
Heated milk
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
raw milk
Heated milk
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
3 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr Flore AMAT
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Flore AMAT
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service d'Allergologie
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-A00641-42
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.