Anesthetic Efficacy of 1,8mL and 3,6mL of Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT ID: NCT02422823

Last Updated: 2016-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ninety patients with irreversible pulpitis diagnostic will participate in this clinical study. The participants will be divided into 2 groups of 45 patients, who will receive the inferior alveolar nerve block injections of 1.8 mL of 4% articaine (Articaine 100; DFL, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3.6mL of the same solution. Two consecutive negative responses to the maximum pulp stimulus (80 µA) at the electric pulp test were the criterion to determine a pulpal anesthesia as successful. Ten minutes after the IAN block, subjective lip anesthesia will be evaluated by asking the patient whether his/her lip was numb. Thereafter and immediately before the pulpectomy, the electric pulp stimulations will be repeated to determine pulpal anesthesia. During the pulpectomy procedure, the patients were instructed to report any painful discomfort. To evaluate the intensity of pain during the pulpectomy, a verbal analogue scale will be used. The anesthesia will be defined as successful when the dentist accessed the pulp chamber without pain being reported by the patient. In these cases, the pulpectomy will be continued. If report pain will classified the IAN block as unsuccessful.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ninety patients will Participate in this clinical study. The patients will be admitted to the Emergency Center of the School of Dentistry at the University of São Paulo with a clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis, The study was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Research on Human Beings of the School of Dentistry at the University of São Paulo (protocol 95/07), and each patient will be informed to sing consent to participate in the study. The 90 participants will be divided into 2 groups of 45 patients, who will receive the inferior alveolar nerve block injections of 1.8 mL (equivalent to 1 cartridge) of 4% articaine (Articaine 100; DFL, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3.6mL (equivalent to 2 cartridges) of the same solution. Two consecutive negative responses to the maximum pulp stimulus (80 µA) at the electric stimulation were the criterion to determine a pulpal anesthesia as successful. Before the IAN block injections, the tooth with irreversible pulpitis, the adjacent tooth, and the contralateral canine will be tested for pulp vitality with an electric pulp test (Vitality Scanner 2006; SybronEndo, Orange, CA). The electric pulp stimulation of the contralateral canine, which will be not anesthetized, will be used as control to ensure that the equipment is working properly and that patients is responding adequately.

The average injection time for each cartridge was approximately 2 minutes. Ten minutes after the IAN block, subjective lip anesthesia will be evaluated by asking the patient whether his/her lip was numb. Thereafter and immediately before the pulpectomy, the electric pulp stimulations will be repeated to determine pulpal anesthesia. During the pulpectomy procedure, the patients were instructed to report any painful discomfort. To evaluate the intensity of pain during the pulpectomy, a verbal analogue scale will be used: 0, no pain; 1, mild, bearable pain; 2, moderate, unbearable pain; 3, severe, intense, and unbearable pain. The anesthesia will be defined as successful when the dentist accessed the pulp chamber without pain being reported by the patient (pain scores 0 or 1). In these cases, the pulpectomy will be continued. Pain scores of 2 or 3 will classified the IAN block as unsuccessful.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulpitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

injection of 1.8mL

injections of 1.8 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Intervention: inferior alveolar nerve block injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of 1.8mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients

Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

injection of 3.6mL

injections of 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Intervention: inferior alveolar nerve block injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of 3.6mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients

Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Articaine

Injection of 1.8mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients

Intervention Type DRUG

Articaine

Injection of 3.6mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients

Intervention Type DRUG

Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Articaine 100, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil Articaine 100, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients 18-50 years, with mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis, and have 1 molar adjacent to a molar presenting irreversible pulpites and a healthy contralateral canine with no deep carious lesions, extensive restoration, advanced periodontal disease, a history of trauma, or sensitivity.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who took medication potentially interacting with the anesthetic used in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Isabel Peixoto Tortamano

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Isabel Peixoto Tortamano

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Isabel P Tortamano

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculdade de Odontologia da USP

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Silva SA, Horliana ACRT, Pannuti CM, Braz-Silva PH, Bispo CGC, Buscariolo IA, Rocha RG, Tortamano IP. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine in irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0219536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219536. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31365529 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Volumes

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.