Anesthetic Efficacy of 1,8mL and 3,6mL of Articaine in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT ID: NCT02422823
Last Updated: 2016-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Two Approaches in Enhancing the Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block During Treatment of Mandibular First Permanent Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT05427903
Anaesthetic Efficacy of 2% Mepivacaine Versus 4% Articaine With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT04822415
4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine by Intraligamentary Technique in Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT02807298
Volume Increase Versus Supplemental 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration on Mepivacaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Success
NCT05238727
Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07130760
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The average injection time for each cartridge was approximately 2 minutes. Ten minutes after the IAN block, subjective lip anesthesia will be evaluated by asking the patient whether his/her lip was numb. Thereafter and immediately before the pulpectomy, the electric pulp stimulations will be repeated to determine pulpal anesthesia. During the pulpectomy procedure, the patients were instructed to report any painful discomfort. To evaluate the intensity of pain during the pulpectomy, a verbal analogue scale will be used: 0, no pain; 1, mild, bearable pain; 2, moderate, unbearable pain; 3, severe, intense, and unbearable pain. The anesthesia will be defined as successful when the dentist accessed the pulp chamber without pain being reported by the patient (pain scores 0 or 1). In these cases, the pulpectomy will be continued. Pain scores of 2 or 3 will classified the IAN block as unsuccessful.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
injection of 1.8mL
injections of 1.8 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Intervention: inferior alveolar nerve block injection
Articaine
Injection of 1.8mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients
Epinephrine
injection of 3.6mL
injections of 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Intervention: inferior alveolar nerve block injection
Articaine
Injection of 3.6mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients
Epinephrine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Articaine
Injection of 1.8mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients
Articaine
Injection of 3.6mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine in block the inferior alveolar nerve in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar in 40 patients
Epinephrine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Isabel Peixoto Tortamano
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Isabel Peixoto Tortamano
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Isabel P Tortamano
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculdade de Odontologia da USP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Silva SA, Horliana ACRT, Pannuti CM, Braz-Silva PH, Bispo CGC, Buscariolo IA, Rocha RG, Tortamano IP. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine in irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molar: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0219536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219536. eCollection 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Volumes
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.