Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine Used for Buccal Infiltration and Supplemental Palatinal Infiltration Anesthesia in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT ID: NCT06342869
Last Updated: 2024-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-01
2022-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: Among the patients who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry Endodontic Clinic for the treatment of maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis, 80 volunteers who met the criteria were included in the study. Eighty patients were divided into 4 groups (n = 20). 1. group buccal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine, 2. group buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80,000 epinephrine, 3. group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4.group buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80.000 epinephrine. Pain during the endodontic procedure was determined and recorded according to the Heft Parker visual analog scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anesthesia Techniques in Symptomatic Mandibular Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT05839093
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar Technique
NCT04812639
Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 ml Versus 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration
NCT06119139
4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine by Intraligamentary Technique in Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT02807298
Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
NCT06353815
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
buccal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine
Anesthesia
application of different anesthesia techniques
buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80,000 epinephrine
Anesthesia
application of different anesthesia techniques
buccal and palatinal infiltration with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine
Anesthesia
application of different anesthesia techniques
buccal and palatinal infiltration with 2% lidocaine containing 80.000 epinephrine
Anesthesia
application of different anesthesia techniques
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anesthesia
application of different anesthesia techniques
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. No allergy to local anesthetic substances to be used in the study
3. Upper maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis whose vitality has been proven by pulp tests, with no radiolucency at the root tip
4. Not having used any painkillers, antibiotics, antidepressants and sedative drugs in the last 12 hours
5. Being capable of understanding the Pain scale
Exclusion Criteria
2. Failure to respond to the cold test and electric pulp test performed on the relevant tooth
3. Radiolucent lesion in the apical part of the relevant tooth on periapical radiography
4. No vital tissue is encountered when the pulp chamber is opened
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Damla Kırıcı
associate professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akdeniz University
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
Kolay D, Kirici D. Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and articaine used for buccal infiltration and supplemental palatinal infiltration anesthesia in maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05552-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
690
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.