Copanlisib and Rituximab in Relapsed Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL)

NCT ID: NCT02367040

Last Updated: 2025-10-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

458 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-03

Study Completion Date

2024-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether copanlisib in combination with rituximab is superior to placebo in combination with rituximab in prolonging progression free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed iNHL who have received one or more lines of treatment, including rituximab and who either had a treatment-free interval of ≥ 12 months after completion of the last rituximab-containing treatment, or who are unwilling to receive chemotherapy/for whom chemotherapy is contraindicated on reason of age, comorbidities, and/or residual toxicity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma,Non-Hodgkin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Copanlisib + Rituximab

Combination of the Copanlisib and rituximab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946)

Intervention Type DRUG

Copanlisib is supplied as lyophilized preparation in a 6 mL injection vial. The total amount of copanlisib per vial is 60 mg. The solution for IV infusions is obtained after reconstitution with normal saline solution. Dosing will be administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Copanlisib will be administered before rituximab.

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab dose 375 mg/m2 body surface weekly during Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and then on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7 and 9.The solution for IV infusions is obtained after reconstitution of a calculated concentration of 1 to 4 mg/ml rituximab into an infusion bag containing sterile, pyrogen-free sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection or 5% D-Glucose in water.

Placebo + Rituximab

Combination of Copanlisib placebo and rituximab

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo is supplied as lyophilized preparation in a 6 mL injection vial. The developed placebo lyophilisate is equivalent to the 60 mg copanlisib formulation, with regard to the composition of excipients and the instructions for reconstitution and dose preparation. Placebo dosing will be administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Placebo will be administered before rituximab.

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab dose 375 mg/m2 body surface weekly during Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and then on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7 and 9.The solution for IV infusions is obtained after reconstitution of a calculated concentration of 1 to 4 mg/ml rituximab into an infusion bag containing sterile, pyrogen-free sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection or 5% D-Glucose in water.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Copanlisib (Aliqopa, BAY80-6946)

Copanlisib is supplied as lyophilized preparation in a 6 mL injection vial. The total amount of copanlisib per vial is 60 mg. The solution for IV infusions is obtained after reconstitution with normal saline solution. Dosing will be administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Copanlisib will be administered before rituximab.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo is supplied as lyophilized preparation in a 6 mL injection vial. The developed placebo lyophilisate is equivalent to the 60 mg copanlisib formulation, with regard to the composition of excipients and the instructions for reconstitution and dose preparation. Placebo dosing will be administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Placebo will be administered before rituximab.

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

Rituximab dose 375 mg/m2 body surface weekly during Cycle 1 on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22, and then on Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7 and 9.The solution for IV infusions is obtained after reconstitution of a calculated concentration of 1 to 4 mg/ml rituximab into an infusion bag containing sterile, pyrogen-free sodium chloride 9 mg/ml (0.9%) solution for injection or 5% D-Glucose in water.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of Indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) in CD20 positive patients, with histological subtype limited to:

* Follicular lymphoma(FL) grade1-2-3a
* Small lymphocytic lymphoma(SLL) with absolute lymphocyte count \<5x10\*9/L at study entry
* Lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM)
* Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (splenic, nodal, or extra-nodal)
* Patients must have relapsed (recurrence after complete response or presented progression after partial response) after the last rituximab-, rituximab biosimilars-, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (e.g. obinutuzumab)-containing therapy (other previous treatment lines after rituximab are allowed). A previous regimen is defined as one of the following: at least 2 months of single-agent therapy (less than 2 months of therapy is allowed for patients who responded to single-agent rituximab, rituximab biosimilars, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody); at least 2 consecutive cycles of polychemotherapy; autologous transplant; radioimmunotherapy. Previous exposure to PI3K is acceptable (except to copanlisib) provided there is no resistance. Patients with prior intolerance to PI3K inhibitors other than copanlisib are eligible.
* Non-WM must have at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion (which has not been previously irradiated) according to the Lugano Classification. For patients with splenic MZL (Marginal-zone lymphoma) this requirement may be restricted to splenomegaly alone since that is usually the only manifestation of measurable disease.
* Patients affected by WM who do not have at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion in the baseline radiologic assessment must have measurable disease, defined as presence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) paraprotein with a minimum IgM level ≥ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and positive immunofixation test .
* Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
* Life expectancy of at least 3 months
* Availability of fresh tumor tissue and/or archival tumor tissue for central pathology(obtained within 5 years of the consent date) at Screening
* Adequate baseline laboratory values collected no more than 7 days before starting study treatment
* Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45%
* Patients must either:

* have had a progression-free and treatment-free interval of at least 12 months after completion of the rituximab-, rituximab biosimilars-, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-containing treatment OR
* be considered unfit to receive chemotherapy on reason of age, concomitant morbidities, and/or residual toxicity from previous treatments, or unwillingness to receive chemotherapy. These patients must also have had a progression-free and treatment-free interval of at least 6 months after completion of the last rituximab-, rituximab biosimilars-, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-containing treatment. Patients in whom chemotherapy is contraindicated are defined by one of the following features:

* Age ≥ 80 years
* Age \< 80 years and at least 1 of the following conditions:

* at least 3 grade 3 CIRS-G comorbidities OR
* at least 1 grade 4 CIRS-G comorbidity (if compatible to participation in the study).

Exclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of follicular lymphoma grade 3b or transformed disease, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia
* Progression free interval or treatment free interval of less than 12 months since the last rituximab-, rituximab biosimilars-, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (e.g. obinutuzumab)-containing treatment(including maintenance with these drugs). For patients considered unwilling/unfit to receive chemotherapy : progression free interval or treatment free interval of less than 6 months since the last rituximab-, rituximab biosimilars-, or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody-containing treatment (including maintenance with these drugs), as assessed by the investigator
* History or concurrent condition of interstitial lung disease of any severity and/or severely impaired lung function
* Known lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system
* Patients with HbA1c \> 8.5% at Screening
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV). Patients positive for HBsAg or HBcAb will be eligible if they are negative for HBV-DNA, these patients should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy. Patients positive for anti- HCV antibody will be eligible if they are negative for HCV-RNA
* Documented evidence of resistance to prior treatment with idelalisib or other PI3K inhibitors.
* Prior treatment with copanlisib
* Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Patients who are CMV PCR positive at baseline will not be eligible.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Montvale, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MSK Basking Ridge

New Jersey, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MSK Bergen

New Jersey, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MSK Monmoth

New Jersey, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MSK Westchester

Harrison, New York, United States

Site Status

MSK Commack

Long Island City, New York, United States

Site Status

MSK Rockville Centre

Long Island City, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Ottignies, , Belgium

Site Status

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos/SP, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Temuco, Región de la Araucanía, Chile

Site Status

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

Site Status

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Shengyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China

Site Status

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Site Status

Montería, Departamento de Córdoba, Colombia

Site Status

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia

Site Status

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Metz, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Recklinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Chaïdári, , Greece

Site Status

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Chai Wan, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Genoa, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Florence, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Nankoku, Kochi, Japan

Site Status

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Ōmura, Nagasaki, Japan

Site Status

Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Izumo, Shimane, Japan

Site Status

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Aomori, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Niigata, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Yamagata, , Japan

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Cheras, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kota Kinabalu, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Selangor, , Malaysia

Site Status

Perak, , Malaysia

Site Status

Pulau Pinang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

City of Taguig, , Philippines

Site Status

Pasig, , Philippines

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Kirov, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

George, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Hwasun Gun, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Málaga, Málaga, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Pathum Thani, , Thailand

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Trabzon, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnitsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Hà Nội, , Vietnam

Site Status

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Chile China Colombia France Germany Greece Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Japan Lithuania Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South Korea Spain Taiwan Thailand Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Matasar MJ, Capra M, Ozcan M, Lv F, Li W, Yanez E, Sapunarova K, Lin T, Jin J, Jurczak W, Hamed A, Wang MC, Baker R, Bondarenko I, Zhang Q, Feng J, Geissler K, Lazaroiu M, Saydam G, Szomor A, Bouabdallah K, Galiulin R, Uchida T, Soler LM, Cao A, Hiemeyer F, Mehra A, Childs BH, Shi Y, Zinzani PL. Copanlisib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CHRONOS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):678-689. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00145-5. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33848462 (View on PubMed)

Morcos PN, Moss J, Veasy J, Hiemeyer F, Childs BH, Garmann D. Model-Based Benefit/Risk Analysis for the Copanlisib Intermittent Dosing Regimen. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 May;115(5):1092-1104. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3173. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38226495 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer AG products conducted in Europe.

https://clinicaltrials.bayer.com/study/17067

Click here to find further information and, after study completion, the study results according to Bayer's transparency standards

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-003893-29

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

17067

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.