PERCEPIC: PERC Rule Combined With Implicit Low Clinical Probability

NCT ID: NCT02360540

Last Updated: 2016-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1773 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PERC rule was created to rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) without further exams, with residual PE risk \<2%. Its safety is currently confirmed in low PE prevalence populations as north-American. In European high PE prevalence population, it has been showed that PERC rule used alone or associated with low clinical probability assessed by revised Geneva score (RGS) was not safe. In retrospective study, we suggest that the combination of PERC rule with implicit clinical probability (gestalt) could allow the use of the PERC rule.

PERCEPIC, an observational prospective multicenter study performed in France and Belgium, will test this hypothesis. Therefore, 3000 patients will be included in 12 centers. Primary outcome will be the rate of thromboembolic events or death related or possibly related to PE in patients with low implicit clinical probability and negative PERC rule (8 criteria absents). Upper limit of confidence interval of this rate must be equal or lower than 3% to consider PERC rule as safe in this combination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism Dyspnea Thoracic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gestalt estimation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients admitted to the emergency department for one of the following criteria :

* Dyspnea and/or Thoracic pain without another obvious cause
* Pulmonary embolism suspicion whatever the reason

Exclusion Criteria

* Age lower than 18
* Patients hospitalized for more than 48h
* Ongoing curative anticoagulant therapy for more than 48h before admission
* Patients with thromboembolic disease diagnosed before the admission
* Unavailability for follow-up (short life expectancy, no phone number…)
* Patient refusing to be contacted by phone at 3 month
* Patient refusing that medical data were collected
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre-Marie ROY, MD-PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UH Angers

Andréa PENALOZA, MD-PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc, Bruxelles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Universitaire Saint-Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

UH Erasme

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

UH Liège

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital of Agen

Agen, , France

Site Status

UH Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hospital of Argenteuil

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

UH Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hospital of Le Mans

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

UH Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

UH Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

UH Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Hospital of Saint-Brieuc

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Penaloza A, Soulie C, Moumneh T, Delmez Q, Ghuysen A, El Kouri D, Brice C, Marjanovic NS, Bouget J, Moustafa F, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Imsaad L, Chretien JM, Gable B, Girard P, Sanchez O, Schmidt J, Le Gal G, Meyer G, Delvau N, Roy PM. Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule in European patients with low implicit clinical probability (PERCEPIC): a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e615-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30210-7. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29150390 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHRC2014_02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adjust-Unlikely PE
NCT05708794 COMPLETED