Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy:a Multicenter Outcome Study
NCT ID: NCT00771303
Last Updated: 2018-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
402 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-09-30
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current diagnostic approach in suspected PE is based on sequential diagnostic tests: 1) assessment of clinical probability, 2) fibrin D-dimer measurement, 3) compression ultrasonography of lower limb veins and 4) multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT). However, physicians are reluctant to perform MSCT in pregnant women because of potential adverse effect of radiation exposure to the fetus. For this reason, ventilation/perfusion or perfusion-only lung scan has been the cornerstone of PE diagnosis in pregnant women. Indeed, perfusion lung scan was assumed to be associated with less radiation than computed tomography (CT). However, this technique is now widely abandoned in the usual diagnostic strategy of PE for the following reasons: it is not widely available; its interpretation may be difficult and the test may be inconclusive in the presence of other chest abnormalities. Moreover, recent data convincingly show that the radiation exposure associated with single-slice or multi-slice CT exposes the fetus to less radiation than perfusion lung scan.
However, the use of CT has never been adequately validated in pregnant women with clinically suspected PE. The investigators, therefore, plan to set up a prospective management study in which pregnant women with suspected PE will undergo a sequential diagnostic strategy based on 1) assessment of clinical probability 2) D-dimer measurement 3) compression ultrasonography, and 4) MSCT.
Nowadays, the overestimated fear of radiation exposure for the fetus leads to an irrational attitude and inadequate investigations in pregnant women with suspected PE, even though both European \[3, 4\] and North-American guidelines \[5\] suggest that only objective testing may accurately rule out the disease. The proposed study should lead to an increased awareness of the risks and benefits of appropriate imaging in pregnant women suspected of PE and should result in a more rational management of this under-studied patient group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Two-Site Compression POINt-OF-CARE Ultrasonography for DVT
NCT03056196
Home Treatment of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Based on Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Levels
NCT00455819
Evaluation of Soluble Fibrin in Thrombosis Exclusion
NCT02523937
Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Case of Massive Pulmonary Embolism
NCT00780767
A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Withholding Anticoagulation in Patients With Subsegmental PE Who Have a Negative Serial Bilateral Lower Extremity Ultrasound
NCT01455818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diagnosis of VTE on a clinical basis is unreliable, especially during pregnancy because leg swelling and mild dyspnea are frequent during normal pregnancy.
The current diagnostic approach in suspected PE is based on sequential diagnostic tests: 1) assessment of clinical probability, 2) fibrin D-dimer measurement, 3) compression ultrasonography of lower limb veins and 4) multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT). However, physicians are reluctant to perform MSCT in pregnant women because of potential adverse effect of radiation exposure to the fetus. For this reason, ventilation/perfusion or perfusion-only lung scan has been the cornerstone of PE diagnosis in pregnant women. Indeed, perfusion lung scan was assumed to be associated with less radiation than computed tomography (CT). However, this technique is now widely abandoned in the usual diagnostic strategy of PE for the following reasons: it is not widely available; its interpretation may be difficult and the test may be inconclusive in the presence of other chest abnormalities. Moreover, recent data convincingly show that the radiation exposure associated with single-slice or multi-slice CT exposes the fetus to less radiation than perfusion lung scan.
However, the use of CT has never been adequately validated in pregnant women with clinically suspected PE. We, therefore, plan to set up a prospective management study in which pregnant women with suspected PE will undergo a sequential diagnostic strategy based on 1) assessment of clinical probability 2) D-dimer measurement 3) compression ultrasonography, and 4) MSCT.
Nowadays, the overestimated fear of radiation exposure for the fetus leads to an irrational attitude and inadequate investigations in pregnant women with suspected PE, even though both European and North-American guidelines suggest that only objective testing may accurately rule out the disease. The proposed study should lead to an increased awareness of the risks and benefits of appropriate imaging in pregnant women suspected of PE and should result in a more rational management of this under-studied patient group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ct scan
Pregnant patients with suspected PE will undergo a strategy based on clinical probability assessment, D-dimer measurement, lower limb compression ultrasonography and multi-slice computed tomography.
Pregnant patients with suspected PE will undergo a strategy based on clinical probability assessment, D-dimer, lower limb vein ultrasonography and MSCT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pregnant patients with suspected PE will undergo a strategy based on clinical probability assessment, D-dimer, lower limb vein ultrasonography and MSCT.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Absence of informed consent
* Patients allergic to contrast medium
* Impaired renal function (creatine clearance less than 30 ml/min as estimated by the Cockroft formula)
* Geographic inaccessibility for follow-up
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Swiss National Science Foundation
OTHER
University Hospital, Brest
OTHER
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Righini
Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pierre-Marie ROY
Angers, , France
Grégoire LE GAL
Brest, , France
Florence PARENT
Clamart, , France
Isabelle QUERE
Montpellier, , France
Jean-Christophe GRIS
Nîmes, , France
Guy MEYER
Paris, , France
Caroline BOHEC
Pau, , France
Antoine ELIAS
Toulon, , France
Marc Righini
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Swiss medical Foundation
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
3200B0-120760
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.