STA®-Liatest®D-Di-Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism

NCT ID: NCT01221805

Last Updated: 2016-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2040 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of STA® Liatest® D-Di combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) or Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in a 3 month follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study population will be selected from prospective, consecutive ambulatory outpatients suspected of having venous thromboembolism.

These patients will first be evaluated using the Wells score:

* patients with low or moderate pretest probability will be considered for D-dimer testing, those with D-dimer positive will be considered for an imaging procedure,
* patients with high pretest probability will be considered for an imaging procedure.

Patients with "low or moderate" pretest probability and a negative D-Dimer result will be followed for 3 months to evaluate potential development of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.

These patients will be contacted by phone 3 month after their first visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deep Venous Thrombosis Pulmonary Embolism D-dimer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is \< 80 years old.
2. Patient presenting at least one of these symptoms indicative of proximal DVT or PE:

* symptoms for proximal DVT: leg pain, tenderness (discomfort through palpation), leg swelling, and /or edema,
* symptoms for PE: hemoptysis, lung related chest pain, dyspnea.
3. Patient provides written informed consent to participate in the study (or verbal no-opposition, as allowed by local regulations)
4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluation at 3 months and can be contacted by telephone

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient presenting with a condition that may be associated with increased D-dimer levels, even in the absence of VTE, such as:

* Fibrinolytic therapy within the previous seven (7) days,
* Bone fracture or surgery (with general anesthesia longer than thirty (30) minutes) within the previous one (1) month,
* Deep hematoma diagnosed by imaging techniques within the previous one (1) month,
* Disseminated malignancies and active cancer (active cancer defined as: cancer for which therapeutic or palliative treatment is either ongoing at the time of enrolment or has stopped less than six (6) months before enrolment),
* Sepsis, severe infections, pneumonia within the previous 1 month,
* Known liver cirrhosis,
* Pregnancy or post-partum within the previous 1 month,
* Atherosclerotic vascular disease thrombosis within the previous 1month (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary syndrome, peripheral artery disease stage III or IV),
* Sickle cell disease,
2. Patients presenting with a suspect thrombotic event related to catheter implantation
3. Ongoing therapeutic anticoagulants (curative and preventive treatment) starting twenty four (24) hours or more before the D-dimer is measured
4. Previous anticoagulant therapy stopped less than three (3) months before the D-dimer is measured
5. Patients with previous DVT/PE occurred less than three (3) months from screening.
6. Suspect thrombotic events in other locations at screening, including distal to the knee and upper extremity DVT (based on standard of care examinations)
7. Patients with known tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) deficiency
8. Patient participating or who has participated within one month of enrollment in another investigational study
9. Major co-morbid condition(s) or other reasons that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the study
Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Diagnostica Stago

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GILLES PERNOD, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Woman's Hosp

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Moses Cone Memorial Hospital

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Univeristy Medical Center

Colombus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Lehigh Valley Hospital Health Network

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Texas Health Fort Worth Hospital

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

University Hospital

Dijon, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

University Hospital

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

IRCCS H San Raffaele

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

University Hospital

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

General Hospital

Soria, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada France Italy Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keeling DM, Mackie IJ, Moody A, Watson HG; Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients and the potential for clinical assessment and D-dimer assays to reduce the need for diagnostic imaging. Br J Haematol. 2004 Jan;124(1):15-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04723.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14675404 (View on PubMed)

Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Castel A, Werker-van Gelder L, Vlasveld LT, van Klink RC, Planken EV, Huisman MV. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;97(1):146-50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17200782 (View on PubMed)

Kelly J, Hunt BJ. A clinical probability assessment and D-dimer measurement should be the initial step in the investigation of suspected venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):1116-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12970044 (View on PubMed)

Pasha SM, Klok FA, Snoep JD, Mos IC, Goekoop RJ, Rodger MA, Huisman MV. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):e123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19942258 (View on PubMed)

Perrier A, Desmarais S, Goehring C, de Moerloose P, Morabia A, Unger PF, Slosman D, Junod A, Bounameaux H. D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):492-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9702032.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9279229 (View on PubMed)

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1227-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023153.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14507948 (View on PubMed)

Pernod G, Caterino J, Maignan M, Tissier C, Kassis J, Lazarchick J; DIET study group. D-Dimer Use and Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis in Emergency Units: Why Is There Such a Difference in Pulmonary Embolism Prevalence between the United States of America and Countries Outside USA? PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169268. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28085911 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DCIC 10 18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adjust-Unlikely PE
NCT05708794 COMPLETED