Safety Study of Outpatient Treatment for Pulmonary Embolism

NCT ID: NCT00425542

Last Updated: 2010-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

343 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether outpatient treatment is as effective and safe as inpatient treatment among low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a worldwide health problem, with an estimated incidence of up to 69 cases per 100,000 persons annually. In the U.S., 101,000 patients were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of PE in 2002, resulting in direct medical costs of $720 million. There is growing evidence that outpatient treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is an effective and safe option for up to 50% of patients with non-massive PE. Despite this evidence, outpatient treatment of PE is uncommon because (1) explicit criteria that identify patients who are at low-risk of adverse medical outcomes have not been available, and (2) randomized trials demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of outpatient treatment have not been performed. We developed a clinical prognostic model that accurately identifies patients with PE who are at low-risk for short-term mortality, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and major bleeding. This model provides clinicians an easily applied, explicit risk stratification tool for patients with PE, addressing a key barrier to outpatient treatment. The broad objective of this clinical trial is to address the other major barrier to outpatient treatment of low-risk patients with non-massive PE, the effectiveness and safety of outpatient management. We will randomize low-risk patients (identified using our prognostic model) with PE from hospital emergency departments to receive outpatient or inpatient treatment with LMWH for ≥5 days, followed by oral anticoagulation. The specific aims of the project are to compare (1) the frequency of recurrent VTE, (2) the frequency of major bleeding and all-cause mortality, and (3) medical resource utilization and patient satisfaction with care among patients randomized to receive outpatient or inpatient treatment with LMWH. The primary study outcome will be the rate of symptomatic recurrent VTE at 3 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes will be the rate of major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The ancillary outcomes will be medical resource utilization and patient satisfaction with care. The hypotheses guiding this trial are that outpatient treatment with LMWH is as effective and safe as inpatient treatment with LMWH, and is also associated with reduced medical resource utilization and increase patient satisfaction with care. This study is innovative because it translates a validated prognostic model into clinical practice and represents the first direct comparison of outpatient versus inpatient treatment of low-risk patients with PE. Successful completion of this project will provide a strong scientific basis for treating low-risk patients with PE in the outpatient setting. Outpatient management of low-risk patients with PE is likely to improve quality and efficiency of care by reducing resource utilization and increasing patient satisfaction with care. Our findings will have importance to physicians, hospitals, and policy-makers who are committed to optimizing patient safety and providing high-quality, cost-effective care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Outpatient treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Outpatient care (vs traditional inpatient care)

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients randomized to the outpatient arm are discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours after randomization. Patients randomized to the inpatient arm are admitted to the hospital and are discharged based on the decision of the managing physician at the hospital.

Inpatient care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Outpatient care (vs traditional inpatient care)

Patients randomized to the outpatient arm are discharged from the emergency department within 24 hours after randomization. Patients randomized to the inpatient arm are admitted to the hospital and are discharged based on the decision of the managing physician at the hospital.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ambulatory care

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \>18 years
* objectively confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
* patients at low-risk (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score \<=85)

Exclusion Criteria

* patients at high-risk (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score \>85)
* presence of hypoxemia (arterial SO2 \<90% measured by pulse oximetry or an paO2 on room air of \<60 mm Hg measured by blood gas analysis)
* systolic blood pressure of \<100 mm Hg
* chest pain necessitating parenteral opioid administration
* active bleeding or at high-risk of major bleeding (stroke during the preceding 10 days, gastrointestinal bleeding during the preceding 14 days, or platelets \<75,000 per mm3)
* renal failure (creatinine clearance of \<30 ml/minute based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula)
* body mass \>150 kg
* history of HIT or allergy to heparins
* therapeutic oral anticoagulation (INR ≥2)at the time of pulmonary embolism diagnosis
* potential barriers to treatment adherence or follow-up (alcoholism, illicit current or recent drug use, psychosis, dementia, homelessness, lack of telephone access, transportation time to nearest ED \>45 minutes)
* known pregnancy
* imprisonment
* diagnosis of pulmonary embolism \>23 hours ago
* refusal or inability to provide informed consent
* prior enrollment in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swiss National Science Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Lausanne Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Lausanne

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Drahomir Aujesky, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Donald M Yealy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

UPMC Presbyterian Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University Hospital Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

University of Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

University of Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

University of Argenteuil

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

University of Boulogne

Boulogne, , France

Site Status

University Hospital of Brest

Brest, , France

Site Status

University of Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

University of Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

University of Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil

Paris, , France

Site Status

Thiers

Thiers, , France

Site Status

Kantonsspital Baden

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

University of Geneva

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital of Lausanne

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium France Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, Auble TE, Perrier A, Cornuz J, Roy PM, Fine MJ. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct 15;172(8):1041-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-862OC. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16020800 (View on PubMed)

Aujesky D, Roy PM, Le Manach CP, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, Cornuz J, Fine MJ. Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb;27(4):476-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi588. Epub 2005 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16207738 (View on PubMed)

Aujesky D, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Righini M, Osterwalder J, Egloff M, Renaud B, Verhamme P, Stone RA, Legall C, Sanchez O, Pugh NA, N'gako A, Cornuz J, Hugli O, Beer HJ, Perrier A, Fine MJ, Yealy DM. Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):41-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60824-6. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21703676 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HL085565-01A2

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

3200B0-112165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00974207

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
NCT07032025 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1