Feedback and Rewards to Increase Motivation for Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT02315963
Last Updated: 2021-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Encouragement-induced Movement Therapy in Daily Life
NCT03294187
Studying Rehabilitation Treatments Using Video to Improve Recovery for Adults With Physical Disabilities
NCT07092293
Mirror Feedback, Augmented Task-Specific, Impairment-Oriented Therapy, Home Practice, Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT04978311
Comprehensive Intensive Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT05323916
Strategies Empowering Activities in Everyday Life (SEE 1.0) a Web-based Occupational Therapy Intervention
NCT04588116
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators goal is to target the overall motivation for therapy. During the guided therapy sessions the therapists will be the main motivators and the investigators do not want to interfere with that. But the amount of guided therapy sessions is often limited due to economical reason rather than therapeutic ones. Therefore patients are encouraged to do training on their own if possible and to be active during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic. The investigators target the patients motivation to train by themselves and be active but also the patients attitude towards the guided therapies. It is known that performance feedback can improve motivation \[Harackiewicz 1979\]. Therefore the investigators want to use the data about therapy progress to produce feedback for patients visualizing the patients progress and efforts during the patients stay in the clinic.
The investigators will compare patients who receive normal therapy to patients who receive normal therapy plus performance feedback regarding a variety of motivation measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No intervention group
Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention group
Patients in stroke rehabilitation receiving standard therapy plus performance feedback
Performance Feedback
Performance Feedback regarding the patients efforts and accomplishments during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic, an expected average of 6 weeks. The data available about the patients progress will be analysed and processed to create a visual illustration shown to the patient on a daily bases.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Performance Feedback
Performance Feedback regarding the patients efforts and accomplishments during the patients stay in the rehabilitation clinic, an expected average of 6 weeks. The data available about the patients progress will be analysed and processed to create a visual illustration shown to the patient on a daily bases.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Becks Depression Inventar (BDI) \> 17
* Major aphasia preventing understanding of study materials (according to the treating physician).
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cereneo AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cereneo, Center For Rehabilitation and Neurology
Vitznau, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. A two-year follow-up of a prospective controlled study in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Oct 15;22(15):639-54. doi: 10.1080/096382800445443.
Hosp JA, Pekanovic A, Rioult-Pedotti MS, Luft AR. Dopaminergic projections from midbrain to primary motor cortex mediate motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2481-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5411-10.2011.
Harackiewicz, Judith M. The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 37(8), Aug 1979, 1352-1363.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KFSP Feedback Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.